CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Turbulence Modelling

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 4, 2004, 18:11
Default Turbulence Modelling
  #1
Richard Keays
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I want to find out more about turbulence models for analysing flow over a backward facing step. The best model to use or which model is suited to certain conditions. Also what assumptions do these models require or use for accurate results. I'm trying to analyse reattachment length for different turbulence models. Where can I find information? Richard
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 5, 2004, 03:58
Default Re: Turbulence Modelling
  #2
ROOZBEH
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi;

The k-e turbulence model is a popular and computationaly tractable and robust model. The old version of this model(Std. k-e) is not good to model a flow field with recirculation or with separating zone. This version can not predict real length of separation zone. But the recent version of this model(RNG k-e) is suitable for modeling of flow field with separation zone or recirculation. We can consider the low reynolds number effects in this version.

However the best model but very computationaly expensive to predict the separation zone is Reynols stress model.

The software documentation is very good to understand turbulence modelling in fluent and others.

Hope this help you

ROOZBEH
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2004, 00:11
Default Re: Turbulence Modelling
  #3
Sohail Ahmed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have been working on supersonic gas flow thru a convergent-divergent (Laval) Nozzle, using Fluent. The inlet conditions are 50 bar, 3000 K, Back pressure is 5480 Pa with 216 K. I have used k-E RNG model, with inlet and outlet pressure as boundary condition. (Outlet pressure defined as the same as back pressure)

The results show an abrupt reduction in Mach number just before the exit line and only near the symmetry axis of the nozzle. No abnormality found near walls. At the point where Mach number decreases, static temp has increased, total pressure decreased, but surprisingly the static pressure and density remains constant. Just before this abnormality, the radial velocity becomes negative, that is, the gas flows towards axis of symmetry; which in my opinion is the cause of reduction/ disturbance of axial velocity.

I need help in understanding the cause of this phenomenon. Also, please advise what is the right turbulence model for my case. The analytical, one dimensional solution suggests an exit mach number of 3.6, whereas I am getting 3.4 to 3.5 at the exit line except the region of abnormality where it has decreased upto 3.0

Thanks Sohail Ahmed
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence postprocessing Mohsin FLUENT 0 September 19, 2011 21:05
Homogeneous Turbulence Modelling Zaktatir CFX 0 December 15, 2010 10:37
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! Wen Long Main CFD Forum 3 May 15, 2009 09:52
Turbulence modelling Panos CD-adapco 6 July 8, 2004 02:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29.