CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Convergence of Eulerian-Lagrangian part. tracking

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 29, 2004, 08:50
Default Convergence of Eulerian-Lagrangian part. tracking
  #1
Sven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Calculating a discrete phase particle tracking in Fluent 6, I am trying to determine a reasonable time step size for the solving of the tracking equations.

By trying a single particle injection, and stepwise decreasing the lenght scale or increasing the step lenght factor I expect the solution to converge to some value of residence time for the particle. Instead I find that the residence time do not stabilize to a certain converged value, but tend to fluctuate in a random pattern when decreasing the time step size (even to a very small time step).

Could it be that my grid is too coarse or something..? I know that the minimum time step that is accepted by Fluent is the time step that corresponds to the "length" of a control volume.

Thanks for any tips or explanations!
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 29, 2004, 10:21
Default Re: Convergence of Eulerian-Lagrangian part. track
  #2
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If your flow is turbulent and the particles have stochastic properties, then you will not get the same residence times.

Regards

George
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 29, 2004, 14:06
Default Re: Convergence of Eulerian-Lagrangian part. track
  #3
wxl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I found even if for laminar flow, particle trajectory will not converge as I reduce the time step. Something is not right in Fluent. And I found the particle reflect boundary condition at the centerline of an 2D axisymetric tube is doing funny.

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 30, 2004, 05:21
Default Re: Convergence of Eulerian-Lagrangian part. track
  #4
Sven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your sharing your experience!

That is what I also suspect - that there is something strange with the software. Perhaps somebody have tried the same thing in some ofter software environment? And in that case, any recommendations for choise of software? (laminar duct flow with free surface)
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 30, 2004, 05:34
Default Re: Convergence of Eulerian-Lagrangian part. track
  #5
Sven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your comment, George!

I am modeling laminar flow in a duct, which means that there is no stochastic handling of the particle equations.

I am at this moment calculating the laminar flow using a finer mesh. I am thinking that this could yield in the possibility of smaller time steps in the particle tracking calculations.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
lagrangian particle tracking fail in parallel Edison_Ge OpenFOAM 2 January 11, 2015 08:11
convergence problem when use pisoFoam, LES for wind tunnel case Forrest_Lei OpenFOAM 3 July 19, 2011 06:00
Lagrangian tracking problem flying OpenFOAM 2 March 11, 2011 05:18
Euler-Euler vs. Lagrangian particle tracking for biomass pyrolysis in a rotary kiln audrey Main CFD Forum 0 February 22, 2011 13:09
Defect correction and convergence ganesh Main CFD Forum 4 June 30, 2006 14:20


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45.