|August 9, 2004, 02:39||
why the value got from C_MU_EFF(c,t) is so large?
I need to calculate Re in my case and intend to complete it with a UDF. In order to compute Re, I firstly get the value of Mu through C_MU_EFF(c,t).
To my surprise, this value is larger than the value got form "report/surface integrals/properies/molecular viscosity" about 2 maginitude order. it is obvious that there is a wrong value.
Could you please tell me something about C_MU_EFF(c,t). is this function correct to calculate Re.
Thank you in advance!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Suggested unsteady, implicit solver stable with arbitrarily large time steps||djbungee||OpenFOAM Programming & Development||45||March 23, 2015 05:14|
|LES on a scaled geomentry (Mesh and Large scales)||comb||Main CFD Forum||0||February 8, 2011 07:21|
|large vortex on outlet when gravity accounted for||Alejandra Menchaca||Phoenics||0||March 3, 2009 20:53|
|Floworks for simulation of airflow in large rooms.||kajaken||FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM||1||October 28, 2008 14:58|
|what happens if y+ is too large or too small||Bo Jensen||CD-adapco||12||February 20, 2003 00:31|