 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
why the value got from C_MU_EFF(c,t) is so large? |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 9, 2004, 02:39
|
why the value got from C_MU_EFF(c,t) is so large?
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
I need to calculate Re in my case and intend to complete it with a UDF. In order to compute Re, I firstly get the value of Mu through C_MU_EFF(c,t). To my surprise, this value is larger than the value got form "report/surface integrals/properies/molecular viscosity" about 2 maginitude order. it is obvious that there is a wrong value. Could you please tell me something about C_MU_EFF(c,t). is this function correct to calculate Re. Thank you in advance! Best regards, shancfd |
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Suggested unsteady, implicit solver stable with arbitrarily large time steps | djbungee | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 45 | March 23, 2015 04:14 |
| LES on a scaled geomentry (Mesh and Large scales) | comb | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 8, 2011 06:21 |
| large vortex on outlet when gravity accounted for | Alejandra Menchaca | Phoenics | 0 | March 3, 2009 19:53 |
| Floworks for simulation of airflow in large rooms. | kajaken | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 1 | October 28, 2008 13:58 |
| what happens if y+ is too large or too small | Bo Jensen | Siemens | 12 | February 19, 2003 23:31 |
Linear Mode
