|
[Sponsors] |
November 16, 2004, 06:50 |
UDS BCs at wall
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello to all FLUENT's people, I've to define the boundary conditions for an UDS at a wall by using the Specified Flux option, but I haven't found which is the macro ( ...maybe something as DEFINE_PROFILE...) that I have to use for this case ....could anyone give me some information about this argument???
Thanks in advance!!! Giordano Bruno |
|
November 17, 2004, 09:10 |
Re: UDS BCs at wall
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, you have to use a DEFINE_PROFILE. When it is complied you can link it in the FLUENT GUI by changing the drop down that says constant to your UDF. There is infromation about define profile in the UDF manual.
|
|
November 17, 2004, 14:48 |
Re: UDS BCs at wall
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your response... according to me the UDF manual isn't very clear about this argument.
Regards, Giordano Bruno |
|
November 18, 2004, 05:22 |
Re: UDS BCs at wall
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
OK, well I am using a DEFIN_PROFILE for flux and value BC's for UDS's all the time, and they do work. There is an example in the manual for pressure profile, but this can just as easily be used for any other variable, such as temperature, velocity or, indeed, a UDS. Here is an example of how you would use it, it is almost identical to the manual:
#include "udf.h" DEFINE_PROFILE(UDS_profile, t, i) { face_t f; begin_f_loop(f, t) { F_PROFILE(f, t, i) = 10; // or whatever funciton you want } end_f_loop(f, t) } |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 4 | December 2, 2019 00:04 |
Very technical question about solving wall boundary layer ... | jlb001 | FLUENT | 6 | December 27, 2014 05:56 |
Opening Vs outlet BCs and temporary wall issue | Sam | CFX | 0 | January 16, 2008 18:59 |
AMG versus ICCG | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 7, 2006 15:15 |
Quick Question - Wall Function | D.Tandra | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 16, 2004 04:29 |