CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Vast Mesh Motion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 20, 2005, 09:45
Default Vast Mesh Motion
  #1
Shuto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I am using Fluent to move a 4m car over 100m in a straight line through an unstructured dynamic mesh. I am trying to maintain cell refinement close to the body, within about 10m, but Fluent keeps introducing huge cells.

I have varied every possible parameter and been through all the tutorials and still can't resolve this. Can anyone offer some practical advice?

Thanks, Shuto.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2005, 12:29
Default Re: Vast Mesh Motion
  #2
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is the only reason your mesh is unstructured because of the details of the car?

If so, then you could do a local volume around the car (probably an elogated cube), and mesh the outer surfaces with a mapped quad mesh. Then mesh the local volume with a tet/hybrid mesh, and mesh the rest of the model as a structured mesh. This way, instead of doing the spring meshes, you can do the dynamic layering on the structured mesh and move the entire hybrid mesh (instead of moving the faces of the car and doing a local remesh / spring-based smoothing of the entire volume). It would seem to me that if you set it up like this, you could have the dynamic layering in front of and behind the hybrid volume, and never have to deal with the other types of dynamic mesh.

Like I said before, I've never actually dealt with dynamic meshes before, but I've seen them used a lot, and it seems to me that this would work. If not... um... sorry about that!

Hope this helps, and goodluck Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2005, 16:04
Default Re: Vast Mesh Motion
  #3
Shuto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Jason,

Thanks for your input. The main reason I am trying to use an unstructured mesh is to enable more complex overtaking maneouvres once I have got the straight line working so I can make comparisons.

Ideally I'd like the overtaking vehicle to approach in the same lane, pull out, pass, and pull in again. Once I get more sophistication built in I'd like the vehicles to be accelerated and rotated by the aerodynamic forces. Maybe I am being over ambitious...

Thanks again! Shuto.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
Prescribed mesh motion does not correspond to actual motion rbarrett CFX 8 June 30, 2011 13:22
external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM 11 January 15, 2010 19:43
mesh motion samad87 FLUENT 0 August 6, 2009 03:15
Mesh motion Hex cells vs tets kev4573 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 December 13, 2007 14:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:20.