|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am simulating flow behing a bluff body.I have read in some paper the this phenomena is unsteady as one can observe constant vortex shedding behind this body. But when i simulate this in Fluent using usteady code I do not get any unsteadiness. How can I capture the unsteadiness using Fluent code. pp
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
if you are using a RANS turbulence model (k-epsilon or something like that) it's of little or no use computing it unsteady. Because RANS is a model that is meant to give a time averaged result. You'll only be able to observe any fluctuations if your inverse turbulent timescale (k/epsilon)^-1 is bigger than your vortex shedding frequency behind your bluff body.... you should perform LES, but it means that you'll have a hihger computational cost!!!
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What is they hysical reasons behind such an statement. "any fluctuations if your inverse turbulent timescale (k/epsilon)^-1 is bigger than your vortex shedding frequency behind your bluff body" Actually I have some papers where they perform this unsteady calculation and obatin the correct vortex shedding frequency. pp
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That is your turbulence time scale should be smaller than vortex shedding time scale. At least an order lower. And you mesh is dense enough!
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX | fatb0y | CFX | 3 | January 14, 2012 19:42 |
| mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 2 | September 18, 2009 08:07 |
| Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry | EmersonKB | CFX | 5 | July 2, 2009 08:17 |
| flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 7 | June 8, 2006 01:19 |
| Is an uniform flow possible for this geometry? | Michael Hu | FLUENT | 1 | April 13, 2006 22:11 |