|
[Sponsors] |
April 13, 2005, 23:41 |
Fluent 6.2 slower than 6.122?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi guys,
I recently upgraded to 6.2 from 6.122. If I run exactly the same case with the same settings in 6.2 - it estimates 14hours for 3000 iterations....while 6.1.22 estimates 10 hours ! Thats 4 hours difference ! Any comments, suggestions? Why is 6.2 running slower? |
|
April 14, 2005, 16:41 |
Re: Fluent 6.2 slower than 6.122?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is it *actually* running slower, is is it just a bad estimate?
|
|
April 14, 2005, 19:18 |
Re: Fluent 6.2 slower than 6.122?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
After checking again, I think the estimates are off in the beginnning. I can start the same case several times and the estimates will be way out.
I do not know what is causing this, but if it does it, all I do is restart and rerun and then it seems to be better. |
|
April 14, 2005, 23:29 |
Re: Fluent 6.2 slower than 6.122?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you're using Windoze, you should place as little confidence as you can on the time for iteration statistics.
|
|
April 15, 2005, 17:44 |
Re: Fluent 6.2 slower than 6.122?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Definetly. With the Eulerian model, which is the model I use more often, it's slower.
ap |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modelling steam-dry reforming of methane in FLUENT 6.2. | Talliks | FLUENT | 0 | March 2, 2010 06:55 |
Fluent 12.0 is worst then Fluent 6.2 | herntan | FLUENT | 5 | December 14, 2009 02:57 |
Fluent 6.2 and 6.3 compatibility | Ale | FLUENT | 0 | July 31, 2008 03:47 |
Implementing own PDF in to fluent 6.2 and higher | Paul | FLUENT | 0 | August 6, 2007 10:47 |
Fluent 6.2 or 6.0? | oliver | FLUENT | 0 | June 12, 2007 11:17 |