 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
April 27, 2005, 09:12
|
Fluent via Flow-3D
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there any body to give me an idea to choose between fluent and flow-3d. I have used fluent for a while and now I want to try using flow-3d for free surface imcopressible turbulence fuild flow. thanks in advance
|
|
|
||
|
April 27, 2005, 11:48
|
Re: Fluent via Flow-3D
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Some friends at the University used Fluent for free surface simulations and were forced to change to OpenFOAM because of financial restrictions.
Now they are quite happy since it works much more stable and faster than before. Sorry but I have no idea how good Flow3d works. |
|
|
|
||
|
April 28, 2005, 04:17
|
Re: Fluent via Flow-3D
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Beilke for attention and interest
 . Any more ideas?
|
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Two Phase Flow and Fluent | Mach_v | FLUENT | 1 | October 7, 2010 02:02 |
| reversed flow in unsteady simulation with dynamic mesh (fluent 12.1) | zhaoyu_001 | FLUENT | 0 | April 7, 2010 00:24 |
| swirling flow in simpleFoam compared with FLUENT | belinda | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 2, 2009 03:57 |
| Fluent Cp more than 1 for incompressible flow | rif | Main CFD Forum | 2 | September 29, 2008 05:25 |
| Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 12:19 |
Linear Mode
