CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 21, 2005, 05:55
Default The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes.
Posts: n/a
Hi CFDers,

My question concerns meshing a geometry with two different sized meshes.

My 3D problem is a U shaped pipe (0.5m diameter) with several small injection nozzles (10mm diameter). In GAMBIT I have tried to save on mesh cell count by creating a fine mesh inside the small nozzles and retaining a coarse mesh through the main pipe. Separating the regions using a connected split operation. The small mesh size is 10mm while the large mesh is 100mm, total cell count 90k.

In Fluent the problem will converge poorly for a basic flow problem (vel-Inlet, pressure-Oulet, single phase). I would like to improve convergence of the problem to <10-2 residuals. Any ideas?

Best regards,

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 21, 2005, 09:49
Default Re: The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes
Mehdi Ghoddosy
Posts: n/a
Dear Owen:

I suggest to Use non-conformal meshing. first create the U shape pipe and nozzels separately in mesh files. then merge them using tmerge utility. then assign interface 1 to the nozzel interfaces in interface creation in FLUENT.this would improve your convergence.

Also i suggest to use two step for fining your mesh. The ratio of ten seems to be large. Use 3-5 as maximum.


Mehdi Ghoddosy
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2005, 05:16
Default Re: The problem with GAMBIT - using two mesh sizes
Posts: n/a
Thank you for your help Mehdi. Until you suggested it I had never heard of the T-merge function.

Is there any advantage to creating separate mesh files and merging them in Fluent (with T-merge) over simply creating the two volumes in GAMBIT and meshing them with different size meshes? I ask this because I find GAMBIT easier to use since it offers more flexibility to manipulate the mesh interface and check skewness.

I have taken your advice to increase the mesh size in two steps - this appeared to reduce the number of highly skewed elements at the interface.
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[GAMBIT] Problem with mesh in Gambit giuseppemerlini ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 12 November 10, 2014 02:04
Problem with Mesh conversion Gambit msh Foam Rachid BANNARI (Bannari) OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 25 September 11, 2011 07:58
gmshToFoam problem: not the same mesh in Gmsh vs. paraview zhernadi Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 8 July 7, 2011 02:28
snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11
Problem for making mesh in GAMBIT chlim FLUENT 0 July 8, 2005 18:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01.