CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Gambit Boundary Layers

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 26, 2005, 09:59
Default Gambit Boundary Layers
  #1
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I have a question regarding Gambit Meshing strategy. I handle complex geometry with small gaps (valves with small spool-openings) for turbulent / incompressible flows. I always divide my models for controlling my final mesh. ( I try my maximum to mesh with hexaedre for better quality). But I never achieved embedding a Boundary Layer, because I don't have any continuity in the boundary layer, because of my models which are divided in "elementary volumes". So I am facing of 2 kinds of mesh strategy: Either I continue to mesh with dividing my geometries with high quality (skewness <0.8), but without Boundary Layer (Y+ always less than 30) Either I try to mesh my models with Boundary Layers (Y+ # 1), but with tetraedres, eg: poor mesh quality. What are you opinions? Maxime

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2005, 12:28
Default Re: Gambit Boundary Layers
  #2
Marcin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, my question is simple.what means communicate: "Skipped smoothing boundary layer (and there name of line and face) since transition !=1:1".I doing 3D geometry and I have big problem with boundary layer in this geometry.in dialogue window is WARN. but I don't know whether in next step in Fluent not be a problem. Thanks for help
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2005, 16:17
Default Re: Gambit Boundary Layers
  #3
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well as I mentionned, I am not used to work with Boundary Layers. I better divide my volumes to control the mesh. So I can't help you, sorry... What kind of geometry are you meshing?
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2005, 08:26
Default Re: Gambit Boundary Layers
  #4
Riaan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
y+ larger than 30 is probably not that bad - should be valid in the Y+=60-90 range if you use wall functions for your turbulence models. Or try using the K-eps with enhanced wall functions enabled
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to set boundary layer of a moving body in GAMBIT to a mesh zone for dynamic mesh tomyangbath FLUENT 18 October 12, 2016 06:57
[Gmsh] gmsh and boundary layers kanuk OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 11 August 14, 2015 12:35
inlet velocity boundary condition murali CFX 5 August 3, 2012 08:56
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues michele OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 July 15, 2005 04:15
Gambit 2 Boundary Layers An Modh Coinniolach FLUENT 2 January 30, 2002 11:54


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:34.