CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

tricky flat plate laminar flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 8, 2005, 14:24
Default tricky flat plate laminar flow
  #1
sarat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi all,

I have done the simulation of laminar flow over a flat plate but the results are very weird.

i gave the BCs:

1. velocity inlet at the entry & freestream(inx-direction)

2. pressure outlet at the outlet with 0 gauge pressure

3. wall with no slip condition

only the flow equations were solved but the cf values along the wall as compared to the blasius solution are highly ridiculous. besides, the velocity at some points exceeds the freestream velocity....I know this is very basic...

please help.... thanx in advance.............sarat

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2005, 22:50
Default Re: tricky flat plate laminar flow
  #2
wei
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1. Grid may need more refinement , cf is easily to match where first grid y+ less than 5.

2. Overshooting is duo to your grid quality, espicilly aspect ratio that results in numerical diffusion.Kind of a paradox to the refined requirment. Has to trade off. Do not remember in fluent manual what is the recommended aspect ratio.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2005, 01:07
Default Re: tricky flat plate laminar flow
  #3
sarat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hey..i think i found the tutorial for the simulation. following the steps as in it, i find that the BL thickness is higher tahn predicted..... also, the BCs of 'outflow' at the top and te outlet of the plate is different than that I have used...i.e. the pressure-outlet condition...

I would use a refined grid and then check it.

I think the recommended aspect ratio is 1.07

thankx...sarat
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2005, 10:08
Default Re: tricky flat plate laminar flow
  #4
wei
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I do not know where you got the number 1.07. Anyway it is unrealistic. 1.07 meant you have to always keep the cell squre. I thought AR less that 5 should be OK.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2005, 18:35
Default Re: tricky flat plate laminar flow
  #5
wei
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I tried myself a flat plate solution with fluent, I got good match on cf and Nu near the wall, but the match with Blasius solution is not good.

Anybody know of why?
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boundary Layer of Laminar Flow over a Flat Plate Blasius_Pohlhausen_Crocco Main CFD Forum 12 September 30, 2013 17:35
Low Reynolds Number Flow over a Flat Plate Go FLUENT 4 August 28, 2013 05:19
laminar flow on flat plate AmirFluid Main CFD Forum 7 June 22, 2010 05:49
boundary layer trips in laminar flat plate flow David FLUENT 0 June 23, 2005 11:01
2d supersonic flow over flat plate puzzled Main CFD Forum 2 March 17, 2004 19:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26.