CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Gambit Meshing Problems

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 27, 2005, 03:48
Default Gambit Meshing Problems
  #1
Francesco B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all, I try to create a volume mesh in Gambit, this is not for me the first time I do this but...... Appear ever the same message: Inizialization failed; perturb boundary nodes and try again.... This is usually caused by problems in the face meshes. Check the skewnesses of your face meshes and make sure the face mesh sizes are not too large in areas of small gaps. What i have to do? Thanks Francesco B.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 27, 2005, 08:33
Default Re: Gambit Meshing Problems
  #2
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well the first thing to do is to "check the skewnesses of your face meshes and make sure the face mesh sizes are not too large in areas of small gaps". In other words, if one of your faces has a highly skewed element, then the volume mesh would be an even higher skeweness and Gambit can't handle it. You can use the Examine Mesh tool (icon on the bottom right of the screen) or you can use the mesh check (it's literally a check mark icon in the Face Mesh commands menu) to find out the worst skewness and where it is. If it's over 0.9 then it's too high. Even over 0.85 is high, but it's possible. Remember, lower is better. If skeweness isn't the problem, then it's typically a problem with mesh size in areas of gaps. If you have two surfaces coming together, you have to make sure that the mesh size is small enough to capture the gap. Along the same line, if you have two faces coming together at an acute angle you can get this error as well. If the problem area isn't intuitive, then you might want to go back to when your geometry was real and split it into smaller volumes. This will help you isolate the problem area. Once you know where the problem is, you can work out a way to fix it.

Hope this helps, and good luck, Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 30, 2005, 04:28
Default Residuals for transient case
  #3
suti
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

Is this true that when running fluent for a transient case, I should run each timestep until all residuals converge AND become more or less flat (ie. slope is almost zero). Can I just run each timestep until all residuals converge but not necessarily become flat? thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem JFDC FLUENT 1 July 11, 2011 05:59
is free meshing or mapped meshing is best for flow problems shanu Main CFD Forum 0 February 18, 2010 12:58
Meshing problems using Gambit Vianney FLUENT 4 May 30, 2009 03:45
meshing a fan using gambit tony FLUENT 1 February 15, 2008 01:28
Gambit: too long meshing time! delsolman FLUENT 1 January 29, 2008 20:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11.