|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2005, 20:51 |
Fluent about three way converter
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If consider the three way converter, made of cordierite monolith, as a porous medium, when the reactants go through the converter, how to define the surface reaction in the porous region? It is well known that the reactions take place on the surface of the channels. Could I regard the monolith reactor with many parallel channels ( 1mm diameter) as a porous region?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stopping a Fluent batch job AND saving the data! Possible? | Volker Pawlik | FLUENT | 13 | December 28, 2020 04:16 |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 03:22 |
Compared MRFSimpleFoam and Fluent in a centrifugal pump! | renyun0511 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | July 6, 2010 06:24 |
Fluent 12.0 is worst then Fluent 6.2 | herntan | FLUENT | 5 | December 14, 2009 02:57 |
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model | Jonas Larsson | FLUENT | 5 | March 13, 2000 03:27 |