
[Sponsors] 
November 21, 2005, 10:49 
Solution calculations and convergence in Fluent

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi all!
Well, I am simulating an external flow in order to calculate drag coefficient of a car. First, I am running simulations in 2D, with the side view of the car. The mesh has 120.000 tri elements and inlet flow is 10m/s. The fact is that I first make 500 iteratinos in order to get a first solution with the ke standard model and standard wallfunctions and then, I run 1500 more iterations with the RNG model and noneq wallfunctions until drag coeff. is gets stable. The problem is that in the iteration 2200 more or less, residuals start to diverge (with a linear slope, not chaotically). I am starting to think that Fluent first make a solution and when residuals are little enaugh, then Fluents tries refine it, but if the mesh is not fine enough, solution diverges. I've refined my mesh with 200000 tri. elem. and then I've run the simulation again, and when it arrives to iteration 2200 solution still converges (but slower). My reasoning with "Fuent's way to calculate" is correct or am I making some mistake with the grid, etc.? (In both simulations I retain y+ in the 30200 range, so I don't think It's an y+ issue) Thanks for advance! 

November 21, 2005, 16:20 
Re: Solution calculations and convergence in Fluen

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Freeman,
Try checking your outlet boundary conditions. What turbulence parameters have you set at the pressure outlet? Yes, you can play with relaxation parameters as well, they are a help at times! Please let me know if it was of any help. Alan. 

November 21, 2005, 16:58 
Re: Solution calculations and convergence in Fluen

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks Alan!
For the inlet Flow I use Intensity turbulence of 0.5% and the hidraulic diameter. For the outlet flow I use the "Outflow" boundary condition, not the "pressure outlet": perhaps my mistake is there, but I don't know the difference between these two boundary conditions. If I try pressure outlet, which turbulence parameters should I use? Thanks a lot! 

November 22, 2005, 05:56 
Re: Solution calculations and convergence in Fluen

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Freeman,
It depends on your application. If you are simulating a wind tunnel, I would prefer using a turbulence intensity of 0.24% and a Hydraulic Diameter of 0.1m. This is good for fully developed flows inside a wind tunnel. As far as the pressure outlet is concerned, if you dont have any data for turbuelence intensity etc, use the outflow boundary condition which is correct in your case. It is suitable for situations where turbulence data is not available! Hope this helps. Thanks, Alan 

November 22, 2005, 11:05 
Re: Solution calculations and convergence in Fluen

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

OK! But the hydraulic diameter doesn't have to be according to tunnel's diameter? Because I am simulating a flow over a car and tunnel must have a diameter of about 4 meters (and I still consider this a low value)
Or this hydraulic diameter that you say has nothing to do with tunnels diameter? Thanks! 

November 30, 2005, 19:48 
Re: Solution calculations and convergence in Fluen

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi freeman
the cross section of the most wind tunnels is rectangular so when calculating hydraulic diameter you must use the formula : Dh=4*A/P where A=area of rectangular crosssection and P=wetted perimeter for further help if you email me I can send a document about this subject best regards Erdem 

April 29, 2009, 23:40 

#7  
New Member
abhishek kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: jaipur, india
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 
Quote:
hello guys i am doing the same analysis in 2d but i really dont know the other parameter. i used the kepsilon eq. to solve it & after 930 itration solution was converged. but i not sure i am right or wrong .. can you tell me all other parameter? other thing is in boundary condition we are using air density constant but in real world that doesnt happen......... if we select density as ideal gas it enables energy eq & in boundary condition as temp is constant it does not solve & stops the itrations..... help me guys... 

May 3, 2009, 22:26 

#8 
New Member
Noorul
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 
hi abhishek...for the iteration, try to reduce the convergence criteria maybe from 0.0001 to 0.01 or 0.05.. then it may stops after few iterations..
Solve >Monitor>Residual> convergence criteria 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Convergence  Centurion2011  FLUENT  30  October 3, 2016 04:45 
Trying to perform test validity of Fluent with simulation of 2D airfoil  didiean  FLUENT  39  December 5, 2015 14:31 
Naca 0012 (compressible and inviscid) flow convergence problem  bipulsaha  FLUENT  1  July 6, 2011 07:51 
Solution Convergence  Ken Adams  FLUENT  10  May 17, 2007 05:48 
problems with solution convergence  Roberto Ciardulli  CDadapco  12  October 29, 2000 04:36 