|
[Sponsors] |
November 11, 2013, 05:55 |
Stirred tank Using MRF
|
#1 |
New Member
Gurpreet
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
[LEFT]hi friends,
i am working on stirred tanks (baffled) with rushton turbine using multiple reference frame for my project work. I am very new to the fluent. i have made the geometry of stirred tank in designmodeler ,i have created an interface between the rotor(moving region) and fluid(stationary region). Now when i am rotating the fluid in contact with the impeller at 180 rpm, keeping the impeller and the outer fluid stationary i am getting the vector plots as given in pictures as the fluid crosses the interface it changes its direction, why is it happening?? plz help |
|
November 11, 2013, 08:09 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26 |
Hi,
check your cell zones; assign to rotor zone absolute rotational velocity of xxx rpm; make stator zone stationary; in boundary conditions set shaft+impeller walls rotating at a relative rotational velocity of 0 rpm and to baffles/tank absolute velocity of 0 rpm. PS: positive rotational velocity means conterclockwise rotation Daniele |
|
November 14, 2013, 03:26 |
thanks for the reply
|
#3 |
New Member
Gurpreet
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
Actually there are many walls in my case in the 'boundary conditions' i dont understand which one is for rotor and which one is for baffle. i used display option to show those walls but it is not showing any. dont know whether there is any mistake in my geometry.
i iterated it for 1500 iterations but after around 1000 graph becomes constant.do i need to iterate more to get better results? can you send me one of your example so that i can compare? gurpreet89@gmail.com |
|
November 14, 2013, 04:14 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26 |
Then, turn back on your geometry and fix it.
An example of mrf is from Mr. Bakker, Stirred tank flow field model http://www.bakker.org/dartmouth06/engs199/ Daniele |
|
November 16, 2013, 09:46 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Gurpreet
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
thanks for replying, i visited bakker's website. He is a very well known personality in the field of stirred tanks and CFD. i downloaded his one of the homework file 'pbt.msh.gc' . i imported that file then putted the same boundary and cell conditions as you told
in cell zone conditions - gave fluid-impeller the 'absolute' volcity of 30 rpm and kept fluid tank as stationary. in boundary conditions - gave relative velocity 0 to the impeller and shaft, and 'absolute' velocity 0 to baffles and tank wall. i used 'coupled' discretisation method and did hybrid initialization, result i am getting as below above image is streamline view contours (top view) vectors as in my case, the vectors inside the rotating zone are moving in opposite direction to the stationary zone. plz help |
|
November 16, 2013, 09:52 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26 |
Hi,
can you plot velocity in stn frame in cfd post? Daniele |
|
November 16, 2013, 10:41 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Gurpreet
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
yes ,now i am getting in the same direction
thank you very much |
|
November 16, 2013, 10:54 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 26 |
Just for your info, when you plot velocity in stn frame you have velocity with regard to a stationary frame.
When you plot velocity you have velocity with regard to the moving frame. Daniele |
|
May 14, 2014, 12:36 |
|
#9 |
New Member
solmaz aryafar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello Daniele and gurpreet89,
First orf all thanks for the useful topic! I have a question!! I tried the same example as you were talking about above (pbt.msh.gz) , and I don't get the convergence at all. I used the same cell zone conditions and boundary conditions, and just one thing I'm not really sure about is the "direction of rotation" which I selected it to be (1 0 0), is that correct? So why my solution doesn't converge??? Actually I tried this example, because I have the same problem with my own example, which is a stirred tank as well. Please help me, I'm running out of time! Thanks in advance, Solmaz. |
|
May 18, 2014, 00:20 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Gurpreet
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
hi,
(1 0 0) means rotation about x-axis, similarly (010) fr rotation about y-axis and (001) about z-axis. If the shaft of the impeller is in X direction then take (100) but i think in that example the it was (001). Gurpreet |
|
May 20, 2014, 09:32 |
|
#11 |
New Member
solmaz aryafar
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello Gurpreet,
Thanks a lot for your answer! I guess now it's getting better, but no in that example the shaft was in the direction of x-axis Look, I have a question here from you, because as I saw in the forum you work (or worked) on stirred tank simulations, am I right? So here I have a problem! I created a mesh in Ansys Meshing for my stirred tank which have pitched blade impellers, and I used MRF approach, but I had issues in convergence, I mean the solution did not converge! As I showed the mesh to an expert (which I couldn't reach anymore unfortunately) he said that the quality of mesh is not good, and that I need to try Sliding Mesh approach. Then I researched a little bit in forumes, and also teh website of Prof. Bakker, and now it seems to me that I need to mesh the part arround the impellers with structured cells as the rest of the tank, am I right? so does it mean that I have to use sweep mesh for this part? I imagined like that, so I tried to mesh this part with sweep methos but the Ansys Meshing complains and says: "this part is not sweepable. So my question is that, I need to use ICEM instead of Ansys Meshing? I mean it's not possible to make sweep meshes arround a complex geometry (like the impellers) with Ansys Meshing? I will appreciate your (or any one else's) help! Solmaz. |
|
May 26, 2014, 11:33 |
|
#12 |
New Member
Gurpreet
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 12 |
hi,
what convergence criteria you are following, 10^-3 or 10^-4 ? In my case, i was able to converge it to 10^-3 using ansys meshing and went closer to 10^-4. i made my rotor and baffles as structured but for fluid zone i used tetrahedral (unstructured). may be your results are not converging due to some geometry issues, if you want your results to be very accurate with error less than 10- 5 % or so,then you can go for ICEM. Results don't vary much either you use MRF or SM, lot of journals are there on the same. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] geometry and griding a stirred tank | prec | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 12 | May 22, 2014 13:46 |
[Design Modeler] Stirred Tank using MRF | gurpreet89 | FLUENT | 2 | October 6, 2013 15:02 |
Monitoring Convergence in Stirred Tank using MRF method | GOPINATH87 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 20, 2011 00:45 |
Stirred tank using MRF | dishengbin | FLUENT | 14 | March 13, 2011 23:11 |
CFX 5.5.1 stirred tank and LES problem | Nishant | CFX | 2 | September 13, 2002 08:11 |