CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

pressure difference - which surface integral?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 4, 2006, 11:29
Default pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #1
Ralf Schmidt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I want to calculate the pressure drop of an apparatus. Now, how to calculate the pressure difference?

I take ->report->surface integrals and select the inlet and the outlet of my apparatus.

But what report type is the right one? "Integral" or "Area-weighted-Average" or any other?? There are different values resulting...

Thanks

Ralf
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 4, 2006, 11:46
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #2
lcw
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think "Area-weighted-Average" is right. In addition, pay attention to the "static pressure difference" and "total pressure difference".

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2006, 02:50
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #3
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, You have to work with Facet Average (choose total pressure). It will compute the average total pressure on the desired surface. If you take inlet and outlet at the same time, fluent will compute the average on surfaces inlet + outlet. So you have to compute the total pressure (Facet Average) on inlet, and then on the outlet. You get 2 values, one for inlet and one for outlet. dp= paverage inlet - paverage outlet mAx
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2006, 04:15
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #4
Ralf Schmidt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I'm a little bit confused... When I take total pressure for pressure drop calculation, it is the static + the dynamic pressure... but the velocities in the inlet and in the outlet are different (different cross-sections)!

So the dynamic pressure difference will NOT give me right results... isn't it?

Second, when Fluent reports the pressures at different times, the values are the same than reporting at the same time. The only difference is that when reporting at the same time, a third value appears: "net".

Does anybody know what kind of value that is? It is NOT the difference between inlet and outlet! It is about factor 1,626 smaller than the inlet pressure value (Area-Weighted Average Static Pressure) calculated for 9 different geometries…

Any Help is appreciated!!

Ralf

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2006, 05:16
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #5
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I suppose the "Net" value is the summ of both values. But as you computed your pressure with Area Weighted Average, the "Net" value you get should be like: paverage = (p1*A1 + p2*A2) /(A1 + A2) where p1,A1 is the pressure and Area on inlet and p2,A2 on outlet. Once again compute your pressure on inlet, and then re-compute the pressure on outlet. Then substract both values. This is my way for computing drop pressures in hydraulic valves.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2006, 06:05
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #6
Muhammad Shakaib
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have doubt about using facet averages for pressure on a surface. I think area weighted is more appropriate since it will work with non-uniform meshes.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2006, 13:18
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #7
mat w
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree with Muhammad and lcw - area weighted average is the option to choose, facet average will give you results based on the size of the mesh facets. This was a mistake that I initially made when I started with Fluent.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2006, 01:27
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #8
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
ok, but in my cases, it doesn't change my results ( I checked and compared with facet average / area weighted average / Mass weigthed average) I get always the same results.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2006, 16:41
Default Re: pressure difference - which surface integral?
  #9
margaret mkhosi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you a lot. It works!
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2012, 14:25
Default Total or static
  #10
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: US
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 6
famerfamer is on a distinguished road
The pressure you measured at the inlet is total pressure or static pressure? Can someone clarify this ? I'm guessing it's total pressure as the surface is perpendicular to the flow direction. But on the other hand, the surface is not like the Pitot tube but only doing the average. I got confused. Please advice.
famerfamer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Referencing a Surface Monitor or Surface Integral in a UDF lanterbw Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 January 28, 2013 16:31
Pulsatile pressure inlet with pressure outlet a.lynchy FLUENT 3 March 23, 2012 14:45
Pneumatic simulation - moving wall as a function of a pressure difference jbmackay OpenFOAM 0 September 22, 2010 15:51
boundaries with gmshToFoam‏ ouafa Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 7 May 21, 2010 12:43
Does star cd takes reference pressure? monica CD-adapco 1 April 19, 2007 11:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:08.