CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 21, 2006, 12:28
Default is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #1
ravi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is it necessary to first do a steady state analysis and from that conserved results as a intial files to do a transient analysis in fluent?
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 21, 2006, 17:37
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #2
Ahmed
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Not always
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 22, 2006, 04:25
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #3
kharicha
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Strictly speaking you have to perform it, in order to verify that your system do not lead to numerical instabilities.

Usteady results means "we model instabilities", and physically usual instabilities are created within region of high gradients(boundary layers and shear layers). A steady state analysis is necessary so that those area are well defined. Then you can switch to the unsteady solver, perturb or not the solution, the instabilities will devellop correctly...

If you do not verify this, then your transient solution might be the sum of numerical and physical unstabilities...this occurs very often.

Mathematically, your transient solution contains the steady state solution. This is what you can observe on many results where the flow simply oscillates arround the steady solution.

But I agree with Ahmed, in some particular problems it is not necessary. Typically it is the case of unsteady boundary conditons (moving walls) or multiphase flows(dripping droplets with VOF)...

So it depends on your problem, and on the time you have for your project...

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 22, 2006, 07:37
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #4
ravi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks sir.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 23, 2006, 04:15
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #5
Luca
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
To me it is senseless to study a problem without getting a steady solution before transient analysis. This is because your system response depends on the (initial) status of your NON-LINEAR system. What you do is then study how your system responds to an excitation signal. Depending of the initial status you'll get a different response. When the transient is over you'll get an another steady-value (depending of what kind of excitation you used). Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 23, 2006, 04:35
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #6
kharicha
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
to Luca,

You have come to the point!!

You are right if the system is highly non-linear, i.e chaotic, i.e strong dependance on the initial conditions.

And before studying a non-linear regime, we should verify first that our model (grid,equations, discretization of the convectif term..) is able to cath the frequencies occuring in the linear regime. And before that it is necessary to perform a steady state analizis....

Strictly speaking, the transient evolution of the system depends on the perturbations introduced added to the steady solution.

But unfortunatly, I know a lot of people that try to model chaotic system without the necessary care. This is either due to a lake of knowledge or a lake of time....

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 23, 2006, 06:49
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #7
Luca
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree with you. Luca
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2006, 10:28
Default Re: is it necessary to d ofirst steady analysis ?
  #8
Marie-Anne
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I read your comments and have a question arising from this even though I agree mostly with what you say. I medelize the onset of natural convection in a chemney. Therefore, if I run a steady state analysis and apply the result as initial conditions to the transient one, the convection is already happening and I cannot see the onset. How do I get to verify my transient computations with no steady state initiation ?

Thank you,

Marie Anne
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Steady level flight airfoil analysis using ANSYS CFX v12 flutter CFX 18 December 14, 2011 00:18
Steady state vs. mean transient analysis of flow behind a circular cylinder Heini Main CFD Forum 1 June 9, 2011 06:47
Steady state Inlet port flow analysis Zamir Rashid CD-adapco 1 May 21, 2006 11:47
quasi steady analysis of 2d airfoil (pitching) Alex FLUENT 1 February 10, 2006 03:54
Using turbulence model for steady state analysis Terry FLUENT 7 February 28, 2001 08:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:45.