CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

finally is over with Fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 28, 2006, 18:10
Default finally is over with Fluent
  #1
freeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I got newsletter from CFX today stating that they've definite agreement to acquire fluent. Despite Mr Cashman doesn't have ready cash to buy it. He hopes to raise it from ANSYSS shares. anyway, it'll make the CFX users have more choices than ever. But this will kill CFD market. Because we're heading towards monopoly as oppose free-market competitions. Now it scares new business comers like me in the market. Anything can happen ...

you email me if you've similar concerns and think the way forward. As the saying goes, if you can't compete then you join the winning team!!
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2006, 08:53
Default Re: finally is over with Fluent
  #2
TG
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This won't kill anything. There is still tne no.2 in the CFD market code around (STAR-CD) which can do roughly anything fluent can and a host of smaller codes in niche markets, government codes, open codes... While things may be less competitive, competition hasn't disappeared. I'm not sure why it would scare someone new in the market. There are still lots of choices.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2006, 09:46
Default Re: finally is over with Fluent
  #3
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree with TG. From what I've seen in the last few years, it's not the big names that make the breakthroughs anyway. Government codes or small niche codes come up with a really smooth way of doing something, and people see it and hit up the big codes to incorporate something similar (that was the progression of MDM, UDF, polyhedral meshing in Fluent 6.3, etc). As long as universities and other research organizations are still working on new models, there will always be growth in the CFD market. And none of this was to put down the big 3's ability to come up with models on their own, but it seems from my experiences that the small guys have fresh eyes and can at least come up with the basics for an idea. Then the big guys have to work how to implement it into their code, which is no small feat either.

I really don't see any reason for anyone to worry about the future of CFD. As long as research is still being done, there will always be improvements. Even if there was a monopoly of commercial codes, that wouldn't put a stop to the research, and the commecial code would still have to incorporate these improvements or risk being brought down by a free NASA or University code.

Just MHO though. Jason
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Problem of Fluent Interpreted UDF: parse error knight Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 12 March 5, 2016 02:26
Two questions on Fluent UDF Steven Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 September 20, 2013 16:30
Compared MRFSimpleFoam and Fluent in a centrifugal pump! renyun0511 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 July 6, 2010 06:24
Fluent 12.0 is worst then Fluent 6.2 herntan FLUENT 5 December 14, 2009 03:57
Problems in lauching FLUENT Lourival FLUENT 3 January 16, 2008 17:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44.