|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Fluent users,
I am interested in knowing if CFX and Fluent has been benchmarked for heat transfer problems. Which software provides better solution and provides higher productivity (ease of use, solver and parametric studies)? I am interested in heat transfer in a rotating equipment with convection from fan air flow. Thanks in advance for your suggestions. Thanks, Ashutosh |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery | Far | CFX | 49 | April 3, 2012 21:08 |
| CFX or Fluent for Turbo machinery ? | Far | FLUENT | 3 | May 27, 2011 03:02 |
| High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
| Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 04:13 |
| Fluent and CFX benchmark | A. Joshi | CFX | 3 | May 16, 2006 14:15 |