|
[Sponsors] |
May 14, 2006, 12:40 |
CPUS: which CPU is better?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm willing to know which CPU is better for fluent 6.2.
Between an Athlon 64 3500+ single core and a 4200+ dual core, both running at 2,2 ghz, is there going to be a great difference between them? How about memory, is there a great difference from 1 to 2 to 4 gb? thanks in advance |
|
May 15, 2006, 03:52 |
Re: CPUS: which CPU is better?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There will be a great advantage to the dual-core CPU, if you have the license to run in parallel. Size of memory depends on the type of flow you are hoping to solve, but get at least 4 GB.
|
|
May 20, 2006, 08:58 |
Re: CPUS: which CPU is better?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
is it possible to make it run in parallel under windows xp sp2? thanks in advance
|
|
May 20, 2006, 09:02 |
Re: CPUS: which CPU is better?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Definitely in XP Pro. But the crucial thing is the parallel license from Fluent.
|
|
May 20, 2006, 09:03 |
Re: CPUS: which CPU is better?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks a lot charles, i'll see into it!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
stop when I run in parallel | Nolwenn | OpenFOAM | 36 | March 21, 2021 04:56 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
OpenFOAM 13 Intel quadcore parallel results | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | February 5, 2008 05:26 |
OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 10, 2007 23:23 |
Dual Core CPU | hjasak | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | July 22, 2006 03:57 |