CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

PRESUMED-PDF ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 24, 2006, 10:27
Default PRESUMED-PDF ?
  #1
abel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

Is it true that we cannot suppose a "beta" deistribution of temperature, mixture fraction and density (in non premixed combustion)WHEN THE PRESSURE IS HIGH ( 40 to 100 bars) ??? the results in moderate pressures 1,2,3 bars are acceptable when using prepdf, but they did not in high pressures. what's the problem ??? is it due to the use of stochastic distribution, or the "presumed" shape is not well (perhaps I should use a calculated pdf ?).

thanks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems with non adiabatic PDF! Christoph_84 FLUENT 0 November 17, 2009 10:55
transported PDF for combustion (total energy PDF) mathieu ourliac Main CFD Forum 0 April 10, 2008 05:38
PDF - conserved scalar approach in KIVA vega Main CFD Forum 0 July 5, 2005 02:49
Presumed PDF for methane combustion Andreas CD-adapco 0 May 21, 2003 09:07
Presumed PDF Zhenyu Wen Main CFD Forum 1 May 20, 2001 14:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:19.