CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Fluent no longer know their Drag vs. Re curves ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 5, 2006, 16:32
Default Fluent no longer know their Drag vs. Re curves ?
  #1
R. Koeman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What a stupid article on fluent.com main page:

http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/pr132.htm

They compare:

Evolution of soccer ball drag at high speeds for different ball designs - 1960's to the present day " zero degrees orientation to oncoming flow.

At what speed? is it the same Reynold number?

This is not how you would represent drag curve for a spherical object moving in the air: it depends on the Reynold number. They showed last time that Drag can change a lot with a small change in Reynolds number:

http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/img/pr43i3_lg.gif

They should plot the Drag vs Reynold number for the four balls as above, other wise it does not mean anything.

I can bet you they have all about the same curve Drag vs. Re.

The kicker just need more force for the old ball because it is heavier. The heavier ball will also keep a higher speed longer as it will be more difficult for the air to stop it once in flight.

Also I'd rather belive the streamline there: http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/pr43.htm than there: http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/pr132.htm

What do you think?

R.K.

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2010, 12:43
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Rick
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 7
RiKR0K is on a distinguished road
The links don't work

Quote:
Originally Posted by R. Koeman
;132961
What a stupid article on fluent.com main page:

http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/pr132.htm

They compare:

Evolution of soccer ball drag at high speeds for different ball designs - 1960's to the present day " zero degrees orientation to oncoming flow.

At what speed? is it the same Reynold number?

This is not how you would represent drag curve for a spherical object moving in the air: it depends on the Reynold number. They showed last time that Drag can change a lot with a small change in Reynolds number:

http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/img/pr43i3_lg.gif

They should plot the Drag vs Reynold number for the four balls as above, other wise it does not mean anything.

I can bet you they have all about the same curve Drag vs. Re.

The kicker just need more force for the old ball because it is heavier. The heavier ball will also keep a higher speed longer as it will be more difficult for the air to stop it once in flight.

Also I'd rather belive the streamline there: http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/pr43.htm than there: http://www.fluent.com/news/pr/pr132.htm

What do you think?

R.K.
RiKR0K is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does FLUENT calculate lift and drag? xTamx420 FLUENT 0 May 30, 2011 13:35
Abaqus - Fluent Coupling WITHOUT MPCCI s.mishra FLUENT 0 May 1, 2011 09:45
Force vectors for drag during sweeping motion aamer FLUENT 0 April 18, 2011 08:17
drag coefficient fluent Francesco Main CFD Forum 2 February 15, 2010 09:59
aerofoil lift and drag curves (with automatic excecution) Elizabeth FLUENT 0 February 26, 2000 12:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:03.