CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

hybrid mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 4, 2006, 11:36
Default hybrid mesh
  #1
Fabrizio
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello guys,

I'd like to create an hybrid mesh with hexa and tetra.

I created my structured hexa mesh in gambit, my problem is that I don't know how to keep the same surface mesh at the interface between the structured mesh and the tetra mesh. (I want the tetra mesh to wrap the structured mesh and so the interface is more than one).

Every interface consists of a set of surfaces at the structured mesh side which are to be coupled with one surface at the tetra mesh side.

In the past I used to do similar tasks by using "split volume" which allows to create two volume with some faces in common that ensure the correct coupling, but in my geometry I have some virtual entities and it is not allowed to use this technique.

I guess that there must be a simple way to do this.

Thank you very much for any hint!

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2006, 13:09
Default Re: hybrid mesh
  #2
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You've got two relatively simple options (as I see it... I might be missing other options).

The first is to manually connect the paired faces. In the face commands there is a button that looks like a black plug. You then pick the two faces that are to be shared. If the geometry's virtual then you'll have to use the virtual options. This only works if the faces to be connected have the same number of nodes and edges, and these nodes and edges match within tolerance (if you choose the normal virtual option, it uses the default tolerance of 1e-5, I believe, otherwise there's an option to use virtual geometry and specify the tolerance but there may be some face warpage if you use too large of a tolerance).

The other option is to use non-conformal meshing. For this one you simply mesh all of the geometry, and don't worry about the mesh being linked across the structured and unstructured faces. You do have to be careful that there isn't a large mesh size difference across the boundary though. When you're defining the BCs, the faces that should've been shared but belong to the structured mesh are given one "interface" BC, and the faces that should've been shared but belong to the unstructured mesh are given another "interface" BC. Then read the mesh into Fluent and define the non-conformal interface (Define->Grid Interfaces... don't use the periodic or the coupled options).

The grid interface tends to be easier, but you're going to incorporate some numerical error... if your grid is refined enough and there isn't a large change in mesh size across the interface, then the numerical error will be small or negligible. Connecting the faces is usually the "correct" way of doing it, but if you have a lot of faces, or if they have different numbers of nodes (or the nodes don't line up...) then this can become very tedious, very quick, or even impossible when dealing with virtual geometry.

Hope this helps, and good luck, Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 7, 2006, 02:31
Default Re: hybrid mesh
  #3
Fabrizio
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you very much, Jason.

Now everything is more clear. Even if this is a little disappointing: it doesn't exist a way to do everything both quick and clean...

Fabrizio

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2006, 01:10
Default Re: hybrid mesh
  #4
san
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i am intrested to know more amout hybrid mesh. It will very appriciable,If you can share any tutorial which explains hybrid mesh.

thanks inadvance san

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2006, 06:41
Default Re: hybrid mesh
  #5
kenischi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
*********************************************

just an easy way:

- mesh one volumne structured

- mesh second volumne unstructured

- copy second to somewhere with mesh

- delete basic second unstructured

- recopy copied to old place

- you have two faces for interfacing, also ideal cell sizes for structured and unstructured

- but better way is setting tetrahedral cells between str.-unstr. in tgrid

As i know interfacing is just a 1-d surface interpolation, which destroys vector directions of the 2 missing directions

regards optixxx
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 13 January 22, 2014 05:11
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21
[ICEM] Hybrid mesh for 2D boundary layer Bigio ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 32 January 9, 2014 11:26
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem everest ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 39 June 5, 2013 19:02
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 21 February 6, 2001 08:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:29.