 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
September 25, 2006, 23:02
|
Fluent & CFX
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody,
Could anybody who has used both Fluent and CFX suggest which of these is more suitable for solving Chemical/Metallurgical Engg problems. Also which of these give more accurate solution. Thanx in advance |
|
|
||
|
September 26, 2006, 11:49
|
Re: Fluent & CFX
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
CFX for multiphase, FLUENT for reactions, PHOENICS for turbulence. All of them are eqaully good but this is my opinion.
|
|
|
|
||
|
September 27, 2006, 01:59
|
Re: Fluent & CFX
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanx
|
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 02:54 |
| Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 13:14 |
| OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX | marco | Main CFD Forum | 81 | March 31, 2009 14:22 |
| Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 04:13 |
| Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 15:02 |
Linear Mode
