 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
October 13, 2006, 15:36
|
Should I change to CFX ?
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I have been advised to change to cfx for simulate pump and rotors. What do you think? Is fluent better? Some people say fluent and cfx will share the same licensing keys. Is this correct? Raul |
|
|
||
|
October 15, 2006, 13:58
|
Re: Should I change to CFX ?
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I doubt Fluent and CFX will share the same license keys for a long time, if ever.
Also, CFX is perceived as the leader when it comes to turbomachinery, however, I think with due care you can probably get a good result in either code. |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 02:20 |
| heat generation in CFX | Ema | CFX | 4 | August 7, 2009 05:39 |
| Electronics Enclosure Analysis with CFX | Simulation Engineer | CFX | 1 | April 22, 2009 11:08 |
| no enthalpy change across the momentum source | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 2 | December 19, 2005 02:33 |
| CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 04:07 |
Linear Mode
