|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Need to ask you a question regarding a turbulent natural convection scenario inside a large hall.
Now, the simple question is: Does the k-w (Shear Stress Transport) model account for turbulent generation due to buoyancy?. In the fluent manual, the two-equation set for k and w do not show the term that accounts for buoyancy effect, unlike what you see in k-epsilon equations. While not sure about this, I understood from the manual that when I activate the k-w model, the software applies the k-w model for low Re regions and applies the k-e model in the free stream with buoyancy effect. Is this correct?. Thanks in advance for your help. Cheers Amr |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hey Fluent Guru's!! Need help here! | Amr | FLUENT | 3 | July 5, 2006 02:15 |
| Hey Fluent wizards..Need help here !! | Amr | FLUENT | 16 | June 15, 2006 08:27 |
| Turbulence in Fluent | Ian Davidson | FLUENT | 1 | December 11, 2003 13:29 |
| Grid-checking issue in Fluent | Vince | FLUENT | 3 | December 4, 1999 21:56 |
| Fluent 5.0 boundary condition issue with RSM | Flav | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 20, 1999 04:57 |