CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2006, 03:01
Default High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #1
M. suuri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am using gambit grid generator and fluent as solver to simulate flow over a low Re. number airfoil (150,000 to 700,000). I have used BL. while mesh generation. (I donot bay attantion to y+!!).

I used k_omega and k_epsilon modles with diffrent combinations of options.

results were compared to both (1)old german wind tunnel data and also to (2) 2004 wind tunnel data.

Lift coeff. results were between the two exp. results. Drag and pithcing momnet coeff.s show high errors(difrences)

Drag coeff. for example has about 50% error with both exp. results.

Can I get explantion or advise to modify my solver or grid generator configurations.

M. Surri
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2006, 04:54
Default Re: High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #2
Ralf Schmidt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

check the reference valus (report->reference values) the area, that the drag coefficient is related to, is given there.

Ralf
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2006, 06:45
Default Re: High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #3
M. ssuri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Even when I take the drag force in Newtons from fluent and I make the calculation of dynamic pressure (0.5*density*Vinf^2) times the refrence area(1 unit length span * my airfil chord in meters)

I obtain same results as by fluent which means that I used correct ref. values (dayn. preesure ,ref. area and ref length).

thakns

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2006, 08:25
Default Re: High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #4
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why aren't you paying attention to y+???

Drag force will especially be sensitive. If you're worried about it, you should be working with y+ of about 1, k-omega sst... and compare that to k-epsilon with near wall treatment. If you're not paying attention to y+, you may be getting spurious results in the BL...

y+ << 1 is bad

y+ = 1 use near wall treatment (k-epsilon)

12 < y+ < 25 transitioning from the laminar sublayer to the turbulent BL and results are a bit questionable in this region

y+ of 30-300 don't use near wall treatment (k-epsilon)

y+ >> 300 is bad

If you're not paying attention to your y+ values, then you can't really predict what your turbulence model is going to do.

Good luck,<br. Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2006, 07:11
Default Re: High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #5
amir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

If you want to consider the drag over an airfoil you must use the spalart allmaras turbulent model. also you must get the Y+ between (30-60)

Good luck
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2006, 15:47
Default Re: High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #6
D. Dixon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Amir, why is it important to use the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model for drag on an airfoil? Shouldn't all of the drag modeling approaches yield approximately correct drag?
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2006, 09:02
Default Re: High drag coeff. estimated by Gambit+fluent
  #7
amir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
no. because each model will be proper for different useage. for example is low Reinolds number we must use the k-w sst. for airfil you can use the both k-w sst and spallart.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Converting Fluent mesh files to Gambit neutral files samuelkc ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 July 24, 2013 08:02
Gambit and Fluent license error message Dimitris FLUENT 11 October 1, 2012 02:05
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 03:43
Retrieving files in GAMBIT & FLUENT Vidya Raja FLUENT 0 November 5, 2005 21:26
Grid for Fluent v.4 using Gambit? Ray Main CFD Forum 3 October 27, 1999 12:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25.