|January 10, 2007, 12:20||
Can circum-avg-axial give flow rate?
I've been using Fluent for a while now, and I've noticed that something is very odd about the circum-avg-axial function. In simulating incompressible flow through any internal geometry, the average value of axial velocity should remain constant (with a weighting factor of the local radius). In simulating a pipe constriction, resulting in backflow, the average of axial velocity should remain also remain constant with weighting of r (integral of u dot n r dr d theta= flow rate = constant).
When I run circum-avg-axial on the constriction geometry ( axial velocity times the radius) however, I do not get a constant value. The value fluctuates wildly, especially around the region of the geometry change.
I have tried the circum-avg-axial of: axial-velocity axial-velocity * radial coordinate axial-velocity * radial coordinate ^ 2
I do not think any of these is giving me the equivalent to the local flow rate.
Why does circum-avg-axial give this wrong output? Or what function combination should I be using to calculate the flow rate from axial velocity at a given axial distance down my pipe?
It is important that I get flow rate at a specific axial distance-- such as z = 1 or 2, and not flow rate on the entire interior.
Thanks in advance for your help, Amit
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Mass flow rate at the outlet||tejasvikrishna||FLUENT||2||May 25, 2013 02:42|
|Mass Flow Rate is not converging||destgir448||CFX||5||December 11, 2010 06:55|
|How to change from mass flow to volume flow rate||stanley||FLUENT||1||February 2, 2007 07:44|
|mass flow inlet||Denis Tschumperle||FLUENT||7||August 9, 2000 02:19|
|fluid flow fundas||ram||Main CFD Forum||5||June 17, 2000 21:31|