|
[Sponsors] |
Discrepancy between the analytical solution&modeli |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 14, 2007, 18:27 |
Discrepancy between the analytical solution&modeli
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, has anybody tried in modeling first order reaction in Fluent? I set up a batch reactor in Fluent. And a UDS as a reactor. I shut off the velocity and turbulence in solution, just tried to calculate the UDS only. Of course it is unsteady problem, segregated solver, implicit. I set the time size to 1 sec. And found out that the reaction rate from the modeling result was lower that the one I set in source term. (modeling result: C=C0*exp(-0.0062t) source term: C=C0*exp(-0.0076t)). I decreased the time size to 0.5,0.1 sec, the difference even became bigger. I am confused. Can this problem caused by my mesh quality? Any advice is welcome. Thanks in advance.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
comparison with analytical results (1D)and(3D) CFX | Rogerio Fernandes Brito | FLUENT | 1 | December 2, 2012 06:12 |
Oscillating Cylinder in Parallel Flow: Analytical Solution | startingcfd | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 23, 2012 05:49 |
comparison with analytical results (1D)and(3D) CFX | Rogerio Fernandes Brito | CFX | 2 | October 28, 2008 20:26 |
Analytical flow solutions | Antonio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 14, 2005 15:43 |
Analytical flow solutions | Antonio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 15, 2005 17:47 |