
[Sponsors] 
April 6, 2007, 01:29 
what is under relaxation factor?

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi all,
1. What is under relaxation factor? 2. what does its effect towards solution? 3. why we need to specify a lot of factor. i mean need 2 specify for example; mass,mom,energy,density,turbulent....... 4. How do we know the correct factor to be used? 5. Can anybody suggest where i can get properties for wood chips? properties such as thermo prop. like conductivity, porosity...... thanks in advance rayy 

April 8, 2007, 20:56 
Re: what is under relaxation factor?

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Each of the variables(mass,mom,density) represents an equation the solver is trying to solve. Each iteration the values obtained for the variables should get closer and closer together  converge. FOR SIMPLE PROBLEMS ESPECIALLY COLD FLOWS WITHOUT COMBUSTION YOU SHOULD SIMPLY KEEP THE RELAXATION FACTORS AT DEFAULT.
Sometimes for many many reasons the solution can become unstable so a relaxation factor is used  takes part of value from previous iteration to dampen solution and cut out steep oscillations. If you are having convergence trouble start the solution on default then when it starts going to shit(becomes unstable) put pressure 0.2 momentum 0.5 turbulence KE 0.5 turbulence DR 0.5  this should be in the manual. This should sort out most issues much worse and you need a better mesh or something isn't correct. RELAXATION FACTORS MAKE SOLUTION TAKE ALOT LONGER TO CONVERGE SO ONLY USE WHEN YOU REALLY NEED TO. Generally start off without RF's then when solution becomes unstable later on bring them in where needed  whichever equations (residual graph) are unstable, meaning not a nice smooth line but up and down rapidly. Start off moving down from 1 to 0.8 or 0.8 to 0.6 etc. For energy equation start off with 0.9 it takes hundreds or thousands of iterations to converge with relaxation factors in. ALWAYS REMEMBER ALWAYS START WITH DEFAULTS. ONLY WHEN SOLUTION BECOMES UNSTABLE DO YOU RELUCTANTLY LOOK AT THE RESIDUALS AND BRING IN APPROPRIATE RF's. hope this helps 

April 9, 2007, 20:48 
Re: what is under relaxation factor?

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

very detail answer. Thanks Phil.


January 19, 2010, 16:38 
Combustion Relaxation Factors

#4 
New Member
Michelle
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 
I had to lower, my URFs for a combustion model in order to get it stable. Now, I am trying to increase them back to default to make them better.
Is there a particular order in which I should increase them so the solver which would help it converge easier? Thanks! Michelle 

July 9, 2012, 02:52 

#5  
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 7 
Quote:
__________________
Saeed Sadeghi Ansys Fluent CFD Consultant 

August 18, 2012, 10:09 
relaxation factor

#6 
Member
misagh
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 6 
hi,we have under relaxation factor(<1) and also over relaxation factor(>1).
how to adjust the factors is so complicated and cant be explained easily. you can visit this address: www.bakker.org/dartmouth06/engs150/05solv.ppt p.p 1617... i found it really useful. best regards. 

September 24, 2012, 22:38 

#7 
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 6 
Under and over relaxation factors control the stability and convergence rate of the iterative process.The under relaxation factor increases the stability while over relaxation increases the rate of convergence.
xk+1 = w.xcal + (1w).xk yk+1 = w.ycal + (1w).yk For 0<w<1, the method is known as successive under relaxation. For 1<w<2, the method is known as successive over relaxation. where xcal is the value calculated based on xk 

November 2, 2013, 10:03 
helpful article

#8 
New Member
Arash zareinezhad
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Iran
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 
Eects of underrelaxation factors on turbulent flow simulations


April 24, 2014, 05:37 
Underrelaxation factors

#9 
New Member
Meksi Olfa
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: France, Compiègne
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4 
Hello,
I'm simulating a steady state case. Risiduals are fluctuating. And i have no choice else to reduce underrelaxation factors to hence stability. But, I really do not understand the influence of this factor. For example for the momentum in natural convection, if we reduce to 0.1, it is like we take the same old solution of the momentum equation and we ignore the new solution. Is it like this?? thank you an advance 

August 15, 2014, 11:07 
Help for CD Nozzle

#10 
New Member
Ramesh
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4 
I am trying to solve a flow in convergentdivergent nozzle. Initially due to divergence I reduced the under relaxation factor and obtained the result. My doubt is whether I can use the result obtained as it is or again if I have to change the URF to default and run the iteration again to get the result. Help me


August 15, 2014, 16:06 

#11  
Senior Member
Amin
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Somewhere on Earth
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
I think flows in nozzles should model with density based solver! In density based solver there isn't URF,instead you can reduce the courant number to controlling convergence! 

August 16, 2014, 05:58 
Nozzle with Pressure based solver

#12 
New Member
Ramesh
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4 
Initially I tried with density based solver and it didn't worked. So I switched to pressure based solver and got the result. But the result was for reduced URF. My doubt is whether I have to run back the iteration with default UFR. Kindly help me.


August 16, 2014, 06:09 

#13  
Senior Member
Amin
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Somewhere on Earth
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
But if you want to use pressure based solver, I think it's better that your problem converges with more URFs and 2nd order for less numerical error! 

August 16, 2014, 10:58 
Under relaxation factor

#14 
New Member
Ramesh
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4 
Oh okay thank you. I am facing a different problem. I got solution convergence with 100 times reducing all the URFs. Again what I did is increased the URF to the default value, and iterated again (but without initialization). Now I got a different solution. So I am completely confused. Which solution I can take as the final value. Kindly help me. Thank you very much for the quick replay.


August 16, 2014, 11:06 

#15  
Senior Member
Amin
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Somewhere on Earth
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
Usually flows must converge with URFs close to defult,but when the solution isn't stable and diverge we can control the solution with reducing URFs! So when solution converge, it's better to continue solution with defult values and check the new results with previous results! So I think your problem must converge with bigger URF! 

August 16, 2014, 11:12 
Under relaxation factor

#16  
New Member
Ramesh
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:


August 16, 2014, 11:18 

#17  
Senior Member
Amin
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Somewhere on Earth
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:


August 16, 2014, 11:28 
Under relaxation factor

#18 
New Member
Ramesh
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4 

June 8, 2015, 19:00 

#19  
Member
Shane
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:


June 8, 2015, 19:03 

#20  
Member
Shane
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 8 
Quote:
It took a month to know which solver I should use.. You are right, it is density based solver for Flow in Nozzles. Shane 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Under relaxation factor for external coupling  dhxlxz  CFX  10  August 11, 2015 20:52 
under relaxation factor and the steady state  jing113cn  FLUENT  0  November 2, 2009 13:13 
Relaxation factor  Benzaa  Main CFD Forum  1  August 18, 2009 07:27 
Question on adjusting relaxation factor  CFD Rookie  Main CFD Forum  3  January 26, 2004 15:37 
Relaxation factor  Moon  CDadapco  1  June 13, 2003 11:13 