CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Gambit boundary condition for Rankine vortex in 2d

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 21, 2007, 05:18
Default Gambit boundary condition for Rankine vortex in 2d
  #1
bretti
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I'm trying to model a Rankine vortex in Fluent/Gambit in 2 dimensions.

What kind of Boundary Condition should I use for the Rankine vortex? I already tried to use a cirlce as a velocity inlet but this doesn't work and while exporting the mesh there's the error message: "Continuum or boundary condition specified is invalifd for fluent 6".

I'd appreciate any help!

Markus
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2007, 08:52
Default Re: Gambit boundary condition for Rankine vortex i
  #2
Neil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Markus

I take it from what youve said your trying to simulate a cyclone separator or combustor using the seggregated (pressure based) solver under axisymmetric conditions. I assume the inlet is tangential, not that it really matters for a 2D axi-swirl case. Using a circle as a velocity inlet means that the inlet is a face is 2D but when rotated for axi-swirl it becomes a torus volume and a volume can not be using as a BC condition (except for fluid and solid also ignoring source terms). What you can do is define a line of length the same as the hydraulic diameter of the inlet and when rotated for the axi-swirl condition you will have a face as the inlet. Despite it being a ring and does not accurately model multiple tangential injectors its the best your going to get in 2D. If you carry on modelling in 2D expect some difficulties in obtaining good residual convergence of the swirl term in Fluent, it may not occur but I had this problem and I could not resolve it. Switching to 3D may be alot more work but is alot easier to get converged solutions in my experience. If running 3D under the pressure based solver with a decent mesh it doesn't take that long to converge.

Hope this helps

Neil
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2007, 03:46
Default Re: Gambit boundary condition for Rankine vortex i
  #3
bretti
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I'm trying to simulate vortex interaction in 2d using Rankine vortices, I followed your instrductions and used a line as boundary for the vortex and meshed it. But when I tried to export the mesh, the error "boundary entity does not contain any valid entity" occurred. How can I solve this problem?

Thanks. Markus
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
inlet velocity boundary condition murali CFX 5 August 3, 2012 08:56
Mixed/Robin boundary condition aaev OpenFOAM Bugs 2 December 15, 2011 15:03
Rotating interpolated boundary condition hani OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 4, 2006 07:09
Gambit Boundary Edge Problems Ashton Peters FLUENT 0 October 5, 2004 21:59
The Boundary Condition about the Flat Plate boing Main CFD Forum 1 January 6, 2002 17:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29.