# Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 26, 2007, 07:31 Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #1 Sal Guest   Posts: n/a Hello every one. I am simulating a cyclone seperator and I have easily got convergence using K-E, K-E RNG both first and second order discritization. Using the RSM model i can only get convergence for first order but cant seem to get convergence for second order. I am using 517000 tetrahedral cells in the mesh. Can some one help me on this please Thank you in Advance. Sal

 July 26, 2007, 08:07 Re: Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #2 Joe Guest   Posts: n/a Restart the RSM solution from a converged two equation solution. Adjust your under relaxation factors.

 July 26, 2007, 08:15 Re: Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #3 Sal Guest   Posts: n/a Should i start it from the first order discretization. Steady, unsteady, boundary conditions bottom outlet as wall or pressure outlet and if unsteady what would u recomend the time step to be and should I use transient controls and which one? I appreciate this. Sal

 July 26, 2007, 12:00 Re: Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #4 Bubble Guest   Posts: n/a I would recommend that u start using steady state first to build up pressure to create a swirling flow. Once the residual gets stable change to unsteady state because the vortex will move in quasi periodic movement. You can adjust the time step to get better convergence or u can adjust your relaxation factor.

 July 26, 2007, 18:18 Re: Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #5 Sal Guest   Posts: n/a For the bottom wall what do you recomend me to use as a boundary condition. At the moment it is defined as a wall. Do i need to change? if yes what to and would I have to enter any other parameters. Thank you for the help in advance. Sal

 July 27, 2007, 08:16 Re: Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #6 Sal Guest   Posts: n/a While running the boundary conditions i get no reverse flow. Does any one know how to correct this. Thank You. Sal

 July 28, 2007, 01:53 Re: Cyclone Simulation Convergence Problem #7 JSM Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, For cyclone, there are some basic steps in CFD. 1. For meshing - Always use structured mesh (hexahedral elements) with aspect ratio within the range 5 to 10. 2. solver setup - RSM turbulence model is recommended. First solve with default setup with RSM. Once converged, then go to higer order discretization with increased converge monitor 1e-6. 3. Choose time setup size as analysis should converge in every time step. Note: first order converged solution always gives some appropriate values. dont worry about. Cyclone phenomena is purely unsteady. So unsteady with higher order discretization, you can more accurate solution.

December 17, 2014, 04:32
Another viscous model besides rsm
#8
New Member

fatih syakban
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Iam still running Cyclone with double inlet with section angle 30 degree, 2 phase coal and air
Iam going to asking too, can I use another viscous model like k-epsilon realizable to get correct separation efficiency and pressure drop ??
Can you give me advice setting for double inlet cyclone to me ?
because Iam very depressed with my final assignment,

Quote:
 Originally Posted by JSM ;143944 Hi, For cyclone, there are some basic steps in CFD. 1. For meshing - Always use structured mesh (hexahedral elements) with aspect ratio within the range 5 to 10. 2. solver setup - RSM turbulence model is recommended. First solve with default setup with RSM. Once converged, then go to higer order discretization with increased converge monitor 1e-6. 3. Choose time setup size as analysis should converge in every time step. Note: first order converged solution always gives some appropriate values. dont worry about. Cyclone phenomena is purely unsteady. So unsteady with higher order discretization, you can more accurate solution.

 December 17, 2014, 08:46 #9 Senior Member     Daniele Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Italy Posts: 920 Rep Power: 15 As suggested above rsm turbulence model is the most appropriate. If you want to switch to k-epsilon I suggest the rng model with the swirl option switched on. PS: don't be depressed __________________ Google is your friend and the same for the search button!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post fiqs CFX 2 April 21, 2010 15:47 Bedotto NUMECA 1 March 18, 2010 00:40 suthichock Main CFD Forum 27 May 11, 2009 07:05 Emily FLUENT 2 March 21, 2007 23:18 MM FLUENT 1 February 15, 2007 06:24

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:47.