|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I want to investigate a fluid flow over a circular cylinder for Re=3900. I use k-ebsilon turbulent model and unsteady solver. But I could not find the approprite stream function (I found symmetry form). It doesn't show any vorticity in the wake.
Could you please help me to model any turbulent flow over a circular cylinder? |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
See this exemple: http://www.fluent.com/software/sf_me...l_cylinder.htm
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Thanks for your reply. Yes, I tried according to that tutorial but I am confused- In this tutorial 'Laminar' viscous model is considered for Re=150. Is it applicable for Re=3900? I know, at Re=3900 the flow becomes turbulent, so how can it capture a turbulent flow with that laminar model? I selected the model 'define_model_viscous_k-ebsilon', but it didn't demonestrate any vortex shedding. I could not understand what is my fault. Please help me if you know.
Thanking you mahbub |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I notice in the tutorail they use periodic BC. Why is that? What if we use axis BC, will we still get the fluctutaing lift in the monitor panel? I have the problem that my lift and drag is not simulating unsteady behaviour i.e. fluctuation but only converge to a certain value. Could you pls clarify. Sham. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
you dont need to use periodic or axis. just use velocity inlet and outflow. regarding the k-epsilon, it should worked well. i used it before and the results were fine. you better make the grid really fine near the wall. and make sure you use the right time step size (you can read it in the fluent tutorial).
or, you can change the rho to V (velocity ratio). For example: you Re=4000 you have a fix d (cylinder diameter) and miu (viscosity), then you can change the rho and V as long as the Re remains the same. Lets say the d=1 and miu is 1.10-5. your true value of rho is 1 and V is 0.04 m/s. change the ratio between rho and V. lets say, rho to V is 50:1 then rho is 1.4142 and V is 0.02828. usually, higher rho makes the shedding easily visible |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Another way you can use depends on what post-processor you are using. If using Fluent's display, you can not change the max value of the vorticity, that is why you can not see anything. If you use Tecplot, you can export the Fluent data file into tecplot data file including the vorticity magnitude. At first, you might not see any vorticity in Tecplot. After you change the display level of the vorticity from very large to a little smaller, you will see the vorticity much clearer.
I am not very sure about the relationship between vorticity magnitude and Re. Maybe when Re increses, the vorticity magnitude should increase too. Hope this will help you! |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Naomi, Haoyin and others
Thanks for your co-operations but I still couldn't display the vortex shedding in the contour of stream function or velocity magnitude. I used the mesh and followed the instruction from (Just select k-ebsilon turb. instead of laminar and change density to 3900 to change the Re number others are as usual) http://www.fluent.com/software/sf_me...l_cylinder.htm what's the wrong with me. Please help me. Mahbub |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mahbub,
Actually, I simulated the flow over a cylinder couple months ago. In my understanding and my experience, you can not simulate the vortex shedding at a large Re with K-epsilon model. It is straightforward that the vortex shedding should be more significant with the increase of Re, however, it would not be the truth. I am not very sure about this. I did simulate the vortex shedding and Von Karman vortex street at Re = 140. I think that is why the tutorial you mentioned use that specific Re. You can do further research about the relationship between high Re and vortex shedding degree. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think you should read the following post carefully:
http://university.fluent.com/forum/v...6ef5bb5a23e1e8 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
cfd
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 2 ![]() |
Hi,
I am modelling the turbulent flow over the cylinder by fluent(k-epsilon model) I have a basic question about defining the boundary conditions for the domain. The domain is rectangular. for specifying velocity inlet for domain, I have to define the turbulent intensity as well as hydraulic diameter, I want to know I should use the diameter of the cylinder as the Hydraulic diameter or the cross length of the inlet face?! Thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Far (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 1,187
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Default settings should work for most of the problems. Regarding your particular question ,appropriate value is dia of cylinder.
__________________
Best Regards Far |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Far (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 1,187
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Default settings should work for most of the problems. Regarding your particular question ,appropriate value is dia of cylinder.
__________________
Best Regards Far |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can I use turbulent model to solve a laminar flow? | nikhil | FLUENT | 5 | February 1, 2011 10:42 |
| Flow past 2 smooth circular cylinder | slip | FLUENT | 0 | July 8, 2010 18:45 |
| Appropriate model for turbulent, steady state pipe elbow flow | milos | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | July 9, 2009 02:24 |
| flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 7 | June 8, 2006 01:19 |
| Reynolds and Turbulent Flow | Frederic Dubinski | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 20, 2004 13:57 |