|January 13, 2008, 14:00||
CFD in Ground Effect
I have a couple of enquiries regarding a dissertation I am doing regarding WIGE for aeronautical purposes. My dissertation is done entirely in 2D and 3D and I used 3 different turb models SA K-O SST and RSM. I would like to know why in a much more literature answer why the SA and K-O SST preformed better than the RSM model.
Furthermore, i used first point height for my bl mesh and obviously tried to keep my y+ values around 1 for the SA and K-O, but when iterating the same exact mesh for the RSM I was having some rather strange convergence issues. Why is that?
I also did not use any K-Epsilon models because of their stagnation point problems. I thought my drag values would strongly deviate from reality and therefore opted for a K-O SST. Why is this stagnation problem occuring? However, I have seen that many of you have suggested this turbulence model, why? Is it purely because of time?
Thanks in advance for your responses, really appreciate any help I can get!
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|CFD Design...The CFD Future||John C. Chien||Main CFD Forum||20||November 20, 2015 00:40|
|CFD for fans & blower housings||David Carroll||Main CFD Forum||8||August 24, 2000 17:25|
|PC vs. Workstation||Tim Franke||Main CFD Forum||5||September 29, 1999 15:01|
|Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package.||Tareq Al-shaalan||Main CFD Forum||10||June 12, 1999 23:27|
|public CFD Code development||Heinz Wilkening||Main CFD Forum||38||March 5, 1999 12:44|