
[Sponsors] 
January 17, 2008, 16:18 
Mesh guidelines for Komega turbulence model

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hello,
I am have a small doubt regarding near wall mesh density when modelling heat transfer using Komega SST model. FLUENT suugests that if you are not modelling low reynolds number flows (as is my case) the near wall mesh density should be such that the first cell centroid has to be in the buffer layer with y+ ~ 30300 and it goes on to advice not have the y+ values below the lower bound of 30. My doubt is what will happen if the y+ value is way less than say even 5. Does FLUENT still go onto use wall functions and neglect the cells till y+=30 or does it affect the whole solution. It would be really helpful if someone could help me in this regard. Cheers, Gautam. 

January 19, 2008, 18:44 
Re: Mesh guidelines for Komega turbulence model

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

When using kw model, if you activate the transitional flow option meaning you are using Low Re hence you should use Enhance Wall Treatment where the Y+ values should be small whereby Y+<5. If you deactivate transitional flow option meaning you are using High Re whereby Standard Wall Function will be used and your 30<Y+<300.
Hope it helps. This is wellexplained in the manual. Sham. 

January 19, 2008, 18:55 
Re: Mesh guidelines for Komega turbulence model

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks for your time Sham. I already mentioned in my question that I am NOT using transitional flows as mine is a high Reynolds number flow so I will using the same guidelines as standard wall function approach. But my doubt is what happens if my y+ is between 5 and 30 as fluent suggests NOT to have between these two limits for standard wall funtions? What will happen if I have a cell in the buffer layer? Will FLUENT continue to use the wall functions discarding the cells in the buffer layer or will it discard the wall functions and use the cells giving me erroneous results.
Cheers, Gautam. 

February 8, 2008, 17:31 
Re: Mesh guidelines for Komega turbulence model

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Gautam,
I see your problem. I have a similar problem. I model airflow around vehicles where the Re is high and I have no option but to use standard wall functions. However, when I analyse a grid independent solution, often I get say 510% of the surface area of the vehicle with y+ of less than 30. I don't think Fluent switches the wall treatment in selected zones unless the y+ is below 5 and ideally less than 1, to model turbulence all the way to the wall. If you get cells with y+ of 1530 then I don't think Fluent will alter the wall treatment and hence the solution shouldn't be much different. Unless you adapt the grid to y+ values then you'll almost ALWAYS get a solution with y+ below 30 in places because y+ depends on the solution. Hope this helps, Carlos. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
gammaReTheta turbulence model for predicting transitional flows  FelixL  OpenFOAM Programming & Development  79  October 11, 2015 15:30 
how to set periodic boundary conditions  Ganesh  FLUENT  13  January 22, 2014 05:11 
2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH  aeroslacker  Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ...  12  January 19, 2012 04:52 
SST K omega turbulence model  mb.pejvak  Main CFD Forum  8  September 16, 2011 08:52 
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option?  Joe  CFX  2  March 26, 2007 18:10 