CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Defining Boundary Conditions in GAMBIT

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2008, 13:51
Default Defining Boundary Conditions in GAMBIT
  #1
Tim R
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I am doing a study on a free jet exiting a 2D orifice into an open space. The pipe length, diameter are all defined and have associated boundary conditions. The open space is the same. I created an outlet pipe and want to create a suction force on the end, to essentially pull the jet. I was wondering if I could define the outlet as an exhaust fan to create the suction force, or if I just need to create a pressure gradient between the inlet and outlet pipes. Any help would be greatly appreciated, and I can give further details if needed. Thanks.

-Tim
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2008, 21:58
Default Re: Defining Boundary Conditions in GAMBIT
  #2
AAA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

If you know the mass flow rate at the outlet (usually equal to that at the inlet), specify the outlet BC as a "mass flow inlet" with an opposite sign. Choose "Direction vector" as the "direction specification method" and the proper direction in the "X-, Y- Component of flow direction" to have the flow exit from the outlet.

Regards

AAA
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2008, 18:33
Default Re: Defining Boundary Conditions in GAMBIT
  #3
Tim R
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't see where to specify the "Mass Flow Inlet" with an opposite sign. Do you mean have a negative mass flow rate? The flow rate has to be a positive value in fluent, otherwise errors occur. Also, should I set the upstream inlet as a mass flow inlet as well, or as a velocity inlet?

How important is the "Supersonic/Initial gauge pressure" when setting the mass flow inlet for the downstream BC's?

Also, I don't think the mass flow rate in equals the mass flow rate out, because there is a large open space for the jet to spread, followed by the outlet tube, where the suction occurs.

Thanks for the help,

Tim
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2008, 05:30
Default Re: Defining Boundary Conditions in GAMBIT
  #4
AAA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Trust me in this Tim, it works! I use it all the time and it is "computationally" acceptable too.

I presume you don't know the velocity or the pressure at the outlet. So specifying the mass flow rate is your best bet.

Specify the inlet as a velocity inlet (if you know the velocity there) or as a mass flow inlet (if you know the mass flow rate).

As for the outlet, 1) choose Mass flow inlet as the BC, 2) specify the mass flow rate (of course with a positive sign), 3) specify the x- and y- components to give you a vector pointing out of the domain at the boundary (i.e., if the boundary is vertical, and the flow is hitting it from the left, set the x- component to 1 and the y- component to 0).

If you are not dealing with a supersonic flow, leave the "Supersonic/Initial gauge pressure" setting as it is.

If the mass flow "in" is higher than the mass flow "out", the pressure in the domain will be high, and vise versa.

Please get back to me if this gives you and problem!

AAA
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defining "Neutral" boundary conditions? (force=0) MW FLUENT 5 October 5, 2009 05:55
Batch Mode : re-defining boundary conditions MaxiFLOW CFX 6 March 29, 2007 09:41
Defining Boundary conditions in gambit anthro FLUENT 2 February 14, 2007 10:17
Defining boundary conditions on interior faces melanie OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 9 August 10, 2006 10:52
Boundary conditions :gambit marimuthu FLUENT 0 March 26, 2005 07:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:09.