CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

high levels of sub-grid viscosity

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 24, 2015, 05:27
Default high levels of sub-grid viscosity
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15
csuperfect is on a distinguished road
Hi, everyone. Recently, I am working with DES. There are 2 problems that I would like to ask for help here.
First, "very low mesh count for inlet velocity, have the levels of sub-grid viscosity been checked", the question is how can I check the levels of sub-grid viscosity in Fluent?
Second, "high levels of sub-grid viscosity could account for the non-turbulent appearance in the wake of the blunt body", the question is what does the high levels of sub-grid viscosity mean?

Any feedback is very welcome. Thanks!
csuperfect is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2015, 00:14
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,665
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by csuperfect View Post
Hi, everyone. Recently, I am working with DES. There are 2 problems that I would like to ask for help here.
First, "very low mesh count for inlet velocity, have the levels of sub-grid viscosity been checked", the question is how can I check the levels of sub-grid viscosity in Fluent?
Second, "high levels of sub-grid viscosity could account for the non-turbulent appearance in the wake of the blunt body", the question is what does the high levels of sub-grid viscosity mean?

Any feedback is very welcome. Thanks!
I don't what it is for DES, but for LES the variable is "subgrid turbulent viscosity" in the GUI. Not sure what it is in TUI.

A high subgrid turbulent viscosity is an indicator that the subgrid scale model is having a large influence on the flow (which can be attributed to mesh being too coarse, i.e. under-resolved DES/LES).
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2015, 02:53
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15
csuperfect is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
I don't what it is for DES, but for LES the variable is "subgrid turbulent viscosity" in the GUI. Not sure what it is in TUI.

A high subgrid turbulent viscosity is an indicator that the subgrid scale model is having a large influence on the flow (which can be attributed to mesh being too coarse, i.e. under-resolved DES/LES).
Yes, I also got it through some references. Thank you very much.
By the way, do I need to refine the mesh in three directions? If that, the total mesh number will increase sharply. Is it OK that I just improve the mesh resolution in the streamwise direction?
csuperfect is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2015, 09:34
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,665
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by csuperfect View Post
Yes, I also got it through some references. Thank you very much.
By the way, do I need to refine the mesh in three directions? If that, the total mesh number will increase sharply. Is it OK that I just improve the mesh resolution in the streamwise direction?
Because of the way the filter width is calculated (from cell volume), reducing the cell volume will tend to decrease the filter width, so you can refine the grid in any direction to achieve that; but it is still best to refine in all three dimensions and if that is not feasible then refine in direction of strongest gradients. Usually the strongest gradients are normal to the streamwise direction. Unfortunately refining the grid in the streamwise direction will do the least to help you with your problem.
csuperfect likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 01:01
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15
csuperfect is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Because of the way the filter width is calculated (from cell volume), reducing the cell volume will tend to decrease the filter width, so you can refine the grid in any direction to achieve that; but it is still best to refine in all three dimensions and if that is not feasible then refine in direction of strongest gradients. Usually the strongest gradients are normal to the streamwise direction. Unfortunately refining the grid in the streamwise direction will do the least to help you with your problem.
Thank you very much. I will try it.
csuperfect is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2015, 19:19
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 15
csuperfect is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Because of the way the filter width is calculated (from cell volume), reducing the cell volume will tend to decrease the filter width, so you can refine the grid in any direction to achieve that; but it is still best to refine in all three dimensions and if that is not feasible then refine in direction of strongest gradients. Usually the strongest gradients are normal to the streamwise direction. Unfortunately refining the grid in the streamwise direction will do the least to help you with your problem.
When I refine the mesh in all three dimensions, can you give me some help or references to ensure the mesh is OK?
By the way, in simulations, the grid-independent validation is needed to be carried out, How can I draw the Coarse mesh, Medium mesh and Fine mesh?
Is it neccesary to keep the height of the first grid the same near wall surface, and I just reduce/increase the nodes/ratio?

Thank you very much!
csuperfect is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High curvature 90 degree bend using SST, eddy viscosity drop?? tinab0binuh Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2014 17:26
Airfoil grid for turbulent flows: high aspect ratios Marconi Main CFD Forum 1 September 29, 2012 13:01
modelling solids viscosity in eulerian multiphase model derkaiser FLUENT 1 December 5, 2011 03:42
problem: very high turbulent viscosity ratio Christine Sindelar FLUENT 2 November 9, 2005 07:23
GRID TO GRID INTERPOLATION in FLUENT calogero FLUENT 3 June 4, 2003 08:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45.