CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

SST k-omega convergence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 9, 2008, 12:09
Default SST k-omega convergence
  #1
mauri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi! I'm simulating a diffuser augmented wind turbine using a SST k-omega model. Residuals of continuity, turbulent kinetic energy and velocity decrease rapidly, but residuals of omega are stable (I mean really fixed on a constant value) on a higher value. Why? What can I do? I've got no problems with k-eps models (and the same mesh)
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 16, 2008, 06:59
Default Re: SST k-omega convergence
  #2
Wiebe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Mauri,

There are a few things that you can try to do. What works really depends on your situation (mesh, steady sate or transient simulation, boundary conditions, etc.)

- try to do some iterations while solving the turbulence equation only.

- lower the relaxation factor for omega, or, if it is really low, try increasing it.

- adapt the mesh to the gradient of omega.

Good luck! Wiebe.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2008, 08:45
Default Re: SST k-omega convergence
  #3
Wiebe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Mauri,

Ironically I had the same problem the past few days. I didn't want to look up turbulence levels for the input boundary condition, so I set it to zero until i would. It turns out that the SST k-omega model doesn't like 0 for both k and omega as inlet boundary condition.

Hopes this helps for you too.

Wiebe.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2008, 13:37
Default Re: SST k-omega convergence
  #4
mauri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Wiebe,

I tried to run some simulations and thanks to your advice things are better, in terms of convergence rate. And of course another problem has arised: when I refine mesh in order to use enhanced wall functions with y+<5 (using adapt menu in fluent, both in conformal mode and in hanging node), then I get a non-physical solution, even starting iterations from a previous solution (which seems correct)!

Sorry for still bothering you...and thanks a lot!!!
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
y+ for k-omega = 30 ??? Ralf Schmidt FLUENT 3 May 20, 2006 17:28
K-omega Amir FLUENT 5 November 22, 2004 10:46
k-omega Amir Main CFD Forum 0 November 18, 2004 04:05
k-omega Chetan Kadakia FLUENT 2 September 1, 2004 17:05
B.C's for k and omega Suppe Main CFD Forum 5 January 14, 2002 11:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:11.