|
[Sponsors] |
Turbulent Viscosity limited while GOOD convergense |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 20, 2008, 07:03 |
Turbulent Viscosity limited while GOOD convergense
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I am modelling a 3d multiphase problem using the Eulerian Model. Some of the phases are granular. I am having good convergence (every 25 itterations) but during the calculations i keep having the following message "Turbulent Viscosity limited to viscocity ratio of 10000 in xxxx cells" Should i worry about the results or it is ok since my equations converge?? Thanks very much in advance, Anastasios |
|
June 20, 2008, 09:54 |
Re: Turbulent Viscosity limited while GOOD converg
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pleas check where the TR is ( iso surface on the limit value) and varify that you have OK solution in that specific are ( velocity and K- eps levels). Changing the P-V coupling due to skewed mesh to PISO may improve. I suspect you have high skew/ High AR or wrong BC problem if this doesnt helt.
|
|
June 20, 2008, 10:19 |
Re: Turbulent Viscosity limited while GOOD converg
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
not necessarily something to worry about as there may indeed be locally high Re values in the domain. So you can increase the limit to 1e6 or the like in the GUI.
|
|
June 20, 2008, 11:30 |
Re: Turbulent Viscosity limited while GOOD converg
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks very much for both responses i ll try to check these things.
Anastasios |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio of | Hua | FLUENT | 7 | September 27, 2019 06:42 |
"turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio" | olivier | FLUENT | 11 | October 10, 2015 05:49 |
Turbulent viscosity Limited to viscosity ratio | Adrian | FLUENT | 12 | September 21, 2011 04:22 |
Turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio... | Cyril | FLUENT | 8 | February 7, 2006 20:34 |
turbulent viscosity limited to viscosity ratio | mukkarum | FLUENT | 3 | May 11, 2004 04:05 |