CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Anyone ever use third order? thoughts?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 20, 2008, 10:09
Default Anyone ever use third order? thoughts?
  #1
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I read an article published by someone who said he got good results for efficiency curves of cyclones using third order MUSCL equations. Anybody else use them? Any thoughts/ideas on how to make them converge?

Also, there is no third order option for pressure. Should I just leave it on second order?

Thanks.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2008, 10:18
Default Re: Anyone ever use third order? thoughts?
  #2
red lemon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
yes leave pressure as second order unless PRESTO or QUICK is better depends on your application and mesh. Use MUSCL for all grid types so you can to reduce diffusion but solution may be more difficult to converge and less tolerant of poor cell quality.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2008, 12:34
Default Re: Anyone ever use third order? thoughts?
  #3
Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah I'm having difficulties getting this to converge. Pressure as second order has worked fine for me before so I've left it as is.

The residuals are bouncing around a little but staying somewhat constant. I can tell from the static pressure contour plots however that this thing is nowhere near convergence. I mean I can obviously screw around with the relaxation factors until it finally converges but its not going to give me good data. So far its run for about 15000 iterations on RSM steady.

What I take to be a bad sign is the lack of stabilization of the static pressure of the outlet (which I have plotting while iterating), which tells me that this isn't going anywhere useful.

Any ideas?
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2008, 14:06
Default Re: Anyone ever use third order? thoughts?
  #4
red lemon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
15000 iterations is a lot! Sounds like the overall case setup needs checking. Also what is grid quality like ? Ensure first and second order are stable first.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4th order discretization of 2nd order difference dusky.He Main CFD Forum 3 February 14, 2007 09:00
OpenFOAM: General thoughts?? open Main CFD Forum 5 September 9, 2006 08:08
first order time, second order space sven CFX 1 October 27, 2005 13:05
thoughts on the different companies Jason Main CFD Forum 0 July 13, 2005 20:18
Thoughts about Courant-Friedrich Levy rate Hamm Main CFD Forum 6 June 3, 2004 04:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54.