CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Turb models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 2, 2008, 11:08
Default Turb models
  #1
Daniel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am conducting aerodynamic analysis on a land speed record vehicle. I have just compared the turulance models Spalart-Allamaras, K-epsilon and K-omega. They all give me pretty much the same Cd and Cl value so whick model should I chose and why?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 3, 2008, 05:35
Default Re: Turb models
  #2
jesse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
k-epsilon is good for the flow in large open area Spalart-Allamaras is given credit in aerodynamic application, especially airfoil, turbomachinery, where the blade experiences large pressure gradient SST is a modified version of k-omega therefore superior over k-omega; which is also good for some flows where typical recirculations are anticipated.

not to overlook is their efficiency, k-epsilon is the most efficient one with acceptable accuracy; while the computation with the spalart and SST model takes usually longer and requires a little more computer power
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 3, 2008, 18:24
Default Re: Turb models
  #3
red lemon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
use realizable k-e for accurate lift and drag prediction but check valid y+ in prism layer for wall function.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2008, 04:04
Default Re: Turb models
  #4
Hossam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
for accurate calculations you may want to try the RSM model which is a second moment closure model and is known to overcome the well known defeciencies of the other RANS models. you should also compare the results of the different turbulence models to experimental data and judge their performance according to their agreement with the data. in the absence of this data you can use large eddy simulation to assesst the performance of other models. this approach is used by many authors now but the computations will be very time consuming. the most important thing is that you have to check the y+ values to ensure appropriate near wall treatment as red lemon said
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two-fluid models vs mixture models for bubbly flows Hansong Tang Main CFD Forum 6 December 8, 2009 03:21
must Turb KE @inlet= Turb KE @ initial condition? Rif Main CFD Forum 0 January 10, 2008 01:49
Turb. modeling Keanu Main CFD Forum 1 August 19, 2004 07:00
closure coefficients in 2-eq. turb. models Michael Main CFD Forum 2 December 8, 2003 12:15
v2f turb Model Heinrich CD-adapco 0 December 20, 2001 17:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:37.