CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Particle Tracking

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2008, 03:24
Default Particle Tracking
  #1
Corentin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

I am using Fluent to calculate trajectories of particles in a plasma flow.

I have been doing it in steady flow but I am now doing it in unsteady flow.

My problem is : in unsteady the trajectories are COMPLETELY different than the ones I have seen in steady, while the plasma flow is more or less the same.

Its seems particles have gained a lot of inertia because they barely not taken in the plasma jet.

I would agree if there were small differences, but there are really big differences.

I guess I made a mistake somewhere.

But I don't have a clue.

What could I made possibly wrong? I just changed for unsteady in the models pannel. I activated unsteady tracking for particles too. The flow is now unsteady but isn't really different from the steady one.

I checked by putting it in steady again and looked at the particles, they are taken as before.

Is there something I could have done wrong?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2008, 08:18
Default Re: Particle Tracking
  #2
Joshua Strodtbeck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you just changed to unsteady in the models panel, then it sounds like you're still using a RANS turbulence model. Your k-e and S-A models are based on equations in which the time derivative disappears due to integration in time, so LES and DES are your only real options in unsteady flow. Yes, I know Fluent lets you use k-e, k-w, and S-A in unsteady flows, but if you do the math carefully, you'll see this is something of an oversight.

Second, your "steady" model isn't really computing steady-state flow. Turbulent flows have no steady-state solution. What it's attempting to do is compute a time-averaged flow field. The actual turbulent phenomena can differ significantly from the time-averaged picture.

Also, make sure your time step is small enough. LES will crash if it's too big.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2008, 08:31
Default Re: Particle Tracking
  #3
Corentin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you.

I know that k-e is doing time averaging and I know it is not very relevant in unsteady flow, I even opened a discussion on that point some time ago.

But I am supposed to use k-e because this is a k-e modifyed for plasma flow, which has been validated, and I don't have any LES model that would be relevant for plasma.

Anyway, I have been asked to use k-e, I am not supposed to change it.

Do you think that the very big differences I am seeing are caused by the differences between steady and unsteady k-e?

The plasma I used for steady particle calculations was just taken from an unsteady k-e simulation that I stopped before injecting particles... so, I still don't understand when I am seeing such different trajectories.

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX particle tracking Mehmet SORGUN CFX 0 February 4, 2009 14:24
particle injection and particle tracking yair FLUENT 0 July 15, 2008 08:27
Particle Tracking ED FLUENT 0 August 7, 2007 01:29
Particle tracking nicostage CFX 1 May 4, 2006 09:08
about particle tracking! shirley FLUENT 0 June 25, 2003 00:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07.