|
[Sponsors] |
July 7, 2008, 03:24 |
Particle Tracking
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi!
I am using Fluent to calculate trajectories of particles in a plasma flow. I have been doing it in steady flow but I am now doing it in unsteady flow. My problem is : in unsteady the trajectories are COMPLETELY different than the ones I have seen in steady, while the plasma flow is more or less the same. Its seems particles have gained a lot of inertia because they barely not taken in the plasma jet. I would agree if there were small differences, but there are really big differences. I guess I made a mistake somewhere. But I don't have a clue. What could I made possibly wrong? I just changed for unsteady in the models pannel. I activated unsteady tracking for particles too. The flow is now unsteady but isn't really different from the steady one. I checked by putting it in steady again and looked at the particles, they are taken as before. Is there something I could have done wrong? Thanks! |
|
July 14, 2008, 08:18 |
Re: Particle Tracking
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you just changed to unsteady in the models panel, then it sounds like you're still using a RANS turbulence model. Your k-e and S-A models are based on equations in which the time derivative disappears due to integration in time, so LES and DES are your only real options in unsteady flow. Yes, I know Fluent lets you use k-e, k-w, and S-A in unsteady flows, but if you do the math carefully, you'll see this is something of an oversight.
Second, your "steady" model isn't really computing steady-state flow. Turbulent flows have no steady-state solution. What it's attempting to do is compute a time-averaged flow field. The actual turbulent phenomena can differ significantly from the time-averaged picture. Also, make sure your time step is small enough. LES will crash if it's too big. |
|
July 14, 2008, 08:31 |
Re: Particle Tracking
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you.
I know that k-e is doing time averaging and I know it is not very relevant in unsteady flow, I even opened a discussion on that point some time ago. But I am supposed to use k-e because this is a k-e modifyed for plasma flow, which has been validated, and I don't have any LES model that would be relevant for plasma. Anyway, I have been asked to use k-e, I am not supposed to change it. Do you think that the very big differences I am seeing are caused by the differences between steady and unsteady k-e? The plasma I used for steady particle calculations was just taken from an unsteady k-e simulation that I stopped before injecting particles... so, I still don't understand when I am seeing such different trajectories. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX particle tracking | Mehmet SORGUN | CFX | 0 | February 4, 2009 13:24 |
particle injection and particle tracking | yair | FLUENT | 0 | July 15, 2008 08:27 |
Particle Tracking | ED | FLUENT | 0 | August 7, 2007 01:29 |
Particle tracking | nicostage | CFX | 1 | May 4, 2006 09:08 |
about particle tracking! | shirley | FLUENT | 0 | June 25, 2003 00:34 |