CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

mass conservation problem with VOF model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 10, 2008, 14:57
Default mass conservation problem with VOF model
  #1
pat77
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

Well, I have a problem... I am working on a two-phase flow simulation in a long pipe. I am using the VOF model(steady). The boundary conditions I use are the following: 1) velocity inlet for phase 1 2) velocity inlet for phase 2 3) outflow The simulation seems OK and converged. However, I don't get mass conservation even when I decrease the residual. Is there something wrong with my simulation or is it something to do with the VOF model?

Here is what I obtain:

mixture Mass Flow Rate (kg/s) inlet_inf 45.185421 inlet_sup 217.28444 outlet -222.14208 Net 40.327781

Any idea would be great. Many thanks!

pat77

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2012, 03:37
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 4
kenan is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have the same problem. I'm simulating the two-phase air-water flow in a corrugated pipe of 60 m long but it turns out to be a significant mass imbalance between inlet and outlet. May the problem be due to curvature of corrugations? Corrugations are annular and quite frequent with a depth to pitch ratio of 1/5. (Depth is height of corrugation, while pitch is distance between each corrugation element). I haven't had any problem with smaller ratios using the same model.

I modeled only the quarter pipe, assigning symmetry condition to the longitudinal mid-plane of the pipe. The top boundary is defined as wall, except for a small face on it near the pipe inlet, to allow air in where velocity inlet BC is applied. Pipe inlet is defined as mass flow inlet for water. The discretizaton scheme i employed for volume fraction is Modified HRIC.

Any help would be appreciated.

Regards,
Kenan
kenan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2012, 08:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 4
kenan is on a distinguished road
I got the solution. I found out that it was just because of coarseness level of the grid, as the VOF method needs finer grid to resolve the flow structures in curvature-dominated flows. So i created a finer mesh especially in the region where free surface to be formed. Then mass gain / loss has dissappeared.
kenan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mass Conservation Prabhas FLUENT 0 December 5, 2006 02:15
Mass Conservation in LES Jaswant Main CFD Forum 8 July 4, 2005 22:32
Mass Conservation Balaji FLUENT 0 May 11, 2005 07:16
Mass conservation Diego Nogueira Main CFD Forum 1 July 30, 2004 15:50
Mass Flow Rate Conservation Problem philippe FLUENT 8 May 5, 2003 11:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:37.