CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

[Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 11, 2008, 12:48
Default [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #1
pipolaki
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Good evening,

I'm working on a very simplified geometry of a 2D nozzle with Gambit 2.2.30.

The mesh is as simple as possible and nevertheless, it's deformed as you can see here : http://imagik.fr/view-rl/152656

I've noticed that if I add more nodes, the deformations are more and more important. So, it's possible to avoid any deformations if there is a very few number of nodes. Of course, this solution is not acceptable.

Could you give me any advice ? Do I forget something ?

Thanks in advance for any help...

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2008, 01:28
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #2
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
did you import your geometry? I would delete the mesh, enable the shade mode on, and check if this face is planar or not (with light reflect). Then delete the attached volume without lower geometry, and reconstruct this defect face. Also reconstruct the volume
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2008, 14:30
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #3
pipolaki
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your help. To answer to your question, the geometry has been completely created with Gambit. As I've mentioned in my first message, it's a 2D geometry. All vertex of the geometry has been placed on a Oxy plane. Any other suggestion ?
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2008, 21:00
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #4
gambit-is-trouble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
your case looks interesting. I have never seen gambit behaving like this.

I am not sure how you created this mesh, but a very simple procedure would be.

[*]Mesh two adjacent edges first[*]select face and chose MAP as meshing scheme.[*] Apply mesh

By the way I always do what I have written above and never seen results like yours.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2008, 01:28
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #5
mAx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I already have seen mesh like that. You can try to split your face in 2 faces (split the 2 edges in their middle), or split the edges where the distorsion occures. It will perturb your effect.

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2008, 15:47
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #6
pipolaki
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Gambit-is-trouble, your message makes me laught... Thanks for that. You're right, my case looks "interesting", like a strange disease in fact ;-) Thanks to max too. I'm going to work on your suggestions and I'll be back.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2008, 20:42
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #7
gambit-is-trouble
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"Dear Gambit-is-trouble, your message makes me laught..."

I was polite with you but you have invited it.

Since you have posted here that YOU have failed to generate simple mesh on a simple geometry. There are only two possibilities here.

1. Gambit can not do it.

or

2. You could not do it with gambit.

Since I am visiting this site from 1999, I have never seen any one asking help for making that simple mesh. And since I have meshed the topology myself thousand times with gambit with out any problems. I assume gambit can mesh it. (feel free to prove this statement wrong).

So we come to second possiblity that you could not do it. With given the fact that you posted here for help for this simple geometry, it is very clear that you are one of the most incompetent people on this planet earth. When someone post a reply to your querry you says that his posting make you laugh, this shows that you are not only incompetent but utterly stupid too.

Best of luck with your quest.

I am done with you.

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 14, 2008, 14:31
Default Re: [Gambit] Very simple mesh but derformed
  #8
pipolaki
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oups... There is a big misunderstanding between us.

Of course, my answer was a joke and I'm really (really) sorry if you thought I was serious when I said "you make me laught". Check, there is a little smiley ;-) at the end of my sentence : it was a joke... In fact, your answer "your case looks interesting" makes me feel like a Dr House's patient !!! (http://www.fox.com/house/). Nothing else.

You tried to help me, you gave a part of your time for that and I really (really) appreciate.

For this misunderstanding, I beg your pardon gambit-is-trouble. I don't know that to say. I feel so miserable. I sincerely hope you will read this message.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple Gambit problem Meenu FLUENT 2 December 10, 2007 03:25
Gambit bug on very simple 2d Faces?! Xie FLUENT 0 June 17, 2007 11:51
simple Gambit face geometry jdb FLUENT 4 December 17, 2005 11:40
simple+Gambit+Heat transfer+mesh+problem+ha ha susan FLUENT 1 February 2, 2004 05:40
Simple Meshing Problem with Gambit Mario FLUENT 4 April 18, 2003 09:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:47.