CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

continuity convergence problems in stirred tank

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By dj_croog

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 29, 2009, 05:36
Default continuity convergence problems in stirred tank
Posts: n/a
Hi everyone. I'm trying to simulate a stirred tank with a rushton turbine (H=0.5m Diam=0.5m). I adapted the mesh many times, and now it's composed by almost 2M cells. I'm using steady MRF simulation with k-eps-rng turbolence model, with two zones, one cylindrical and moving, surrounding the turbine, and the outer one stationary. I'm using SIMPLE algorithm for pressure-velocity coupling, presto! for pressure discretization, and 2nd order upwind for the rest, with the default underelaxation values. I started off with 100 rpm and I'm trying to increase the rotational speed.

However I'm experiencing difficulties in continuity convergence. The residuals get stuck on about 5e-02 after 11000 iteration while velocity components k and epsilon drop well under 1e-03. The flow field looks very good though. Also the velocity magnitudes are consistent with the 100 rpm.

What should I do?. Help plz.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 29, 2009, 06:39
Default Re: continuity convergence problems in stirred tan
Posts: n/a
In my experience, adapting the mesh many times is not a good idea. I always got problems similar to what you describe (and more) after such operations.

I would recommend to improve your mesh in preprocessing. and then do minimal adaptation in the solution.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 29, 2009, 06:51
Default Re: continuity convergence problems in stirred tan
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the advice. I was wondering if, given the grid, there was something to change on the solvers that can help me out.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2009, 22:57
Default Re: continuity convergence problems in stirred tan
Posts: n/a
Hey Nycera, usually if your residuals are hovering at a certain point, it is because you have transient flow structures that can not be resolved with a steady state case.

The residuals are there to monitor your simulation. At the end of the day, it is your results that matter most. What I would suggest is to compare some quantitative results from a steady state case and a transient case using sliding mesh, and see how they differ. You will more often then not get more accurate results with a sliding mesh setup. But the question is how bad (or good!) your current results are with MRF compared to sliding mesh? If they are quite close, then you can be happy with your MRF results, otherwise, you might need to change to sliding mesh to improve your results.

Hope that helps.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 3, 2009, 07:43
Default Re: continuity convergence problems in stirred tan
Posts: n/a
Ok thanks for the tip. The thing is I'm simulating with high rotational speeds, so it's not exactly quick to get a result from a sliding mesh setup starting from stationary field. I'm running out of time and I just wanted to get an overview on mrf steady setup.

Another question: if I wanted to advance in time in order to get past the "starting transient" with sliding mesh and reach a steady state of the flow inside the tank, I should use a larger timestep right? Is that possible? How should I set up the solver in order to get convergence within 20 iterations per timestep? I read on fluent manual that the PISO scheme for velocity-pressure coupling is suitable when large timesteps are used.

Is there a limit to the inrease of the timestep? The impeller tip radial velocity at 600rpm is about 9.9 m/s and the grid is made of about 1.5M cells. Is there an empirical method to determine the maximum rotation per timestep of the impeller?

I mean, I know there's a limit, I can't use a 1 second timestep. :-P
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2011, 20:19
Thumbs up
New Member
Craig B
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
dj_croog is on a distinguished road
I'm doing a similar project involving a stirred tank and have had similar problems... About 1.5 million cells...

I got my continuity to converge by reducing the underrelaxation of momentum from the default value (slowly)
Mar777 and Azy like this.
dj_croog is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How specified the TSS and NTS in a Stirred Tank eH FLUENT 0 November 8, 2007 22:37
Stirred Tank Henrique CFX 1 May 7, 2007 18:26
stirred tank nilesh Main CFD Forum 2 September 27, 2006 00:26
Stirred tank, TKE, DES, RSM J. Gimbun FLUENT 0 February 21, 2006 06:57
Convergence of pressure term when using sliding mesh technique in stirred tank Mounir FLUENT 1 January 5, 2000 18:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:04.