CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

2D Axisymmetric & 3D cylinder

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By Jiuan
  • 2 Post By PawnPace

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 25, 2009, 08:38
Default 2D Axisymmetric & 3D cylinder
  #1
Raj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hai

I want to know the difference between 2D Axisymmetric (cylinder) problem and a 3D cylinder problem.

I modelled both for a heat transfer problem and analysed in FLUENT. But the results are not matching.

The problem is

Cylinder length = 500 mm Flowing fluid = Air Inlet temperature = 300 K Wall surface temperature = 400 K Inlet velocity = 0.05 m/s

The result i.e., outlet temperature is varying for both the cases.

Is there any difference in solving both the cases by FLUENT. How to get the same results from both cases.

Kindly suggest me some solution

Regards Raj.

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 25, 2009, 13:34
Default Re: 2D Axisymmetric & 3D cylinder
  #2
Jiuan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is interesting. Before I know your result, I also believe that the results of both case should be the same if the geomerey and boundary condition are axisymmetric. I just want to reminder you that the boundary type for the centerline of cyliner in 2D case should be axis, not symmetry. If all of your setting up is correct, I suggest running a case only with flow, then considering heat transfer.

Hope it help.

sanjeetlimbu likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2009, 04:43
Default Re: 2D Axisymmetric & 3D cylinder
  #3
Raj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your immediate reply Mr. Jiuan

The geometry and Boundary conditions are given the same. The geometry is 50 mm dia. pipe with 500 mm length. For 2D-Axisymmetric case, axis boundary condition was given in x-axis.

Flowing fluid is air.Flow is laminar. Velocity inlet (0.05 m/s)and pressure outlet (0) BC given.

First, I checked for without heat transfer.The results such as skin friction coeffcient at the wall and pressure at the inlet are not matching with that of the 3D case.

Then I included heat transfer i.e., wall is kept at constant temperature of 400 K. The inlet air temperature is given as 300 K.

The result i.e., the area weighted average of air temperature at the outlet doesnot match with that of the 3D case.

If you have already checked some benchmark problems of this kind, kindly suggest them for checking the results.

Thanks & Regards Raj.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2009, 05:06
Default Re: 2D Axisymmetric & 3D cylinder
  #4
Ralf Schmidt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

have you checked the reference values? Are they the same for both?

Maybe it is about the are calculation....

Is the grid the same for both cases??

Ralf
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2009, 02:37
Default Re: 2D Axisymmetric & 3D cylinder
  #5
Raj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your reply Mr. Ralf

I checked the reference values for the cases and they are same. The geometry is same for both cases. The grid is generated is approximately same for both the cases.

Wall is kept at constant temperature of 400 K. The inlet air temperature is given as 300 K.

The area weighted average of temperature at outlet for 1. 2D axisymmetric case : 383 K 2. 3D cylinder case : 399 K

I donot know why this difference is occuring?

Kindly suggest me some solution.

Thanks & Regards Raj.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2009, 07:59
Default
  #6
New Member
 
pinho
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 8
jpinho is on a distinguished road
Is it possible when dealing with 2d axisymmetric, to post-processing the results in a 3d view? How does it work?

Thanks
jpinho
jpinho is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2009, 12:37
Default Check for grid independence!
  #7
New Member
 
Bobby
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
PawnPace is on a distinguished road
Hi,

This is very interesting problem. I was wondering if you had done any grid independence on both the 2D and 3D cases. If you find that the 3D model requires more refined grid and you make certain that results are good (within certain confidence interval) then try to use these the settings (i.e. grid pattern etc) on the 2D case.

If you do find the reason/solution for this mismatch of results, please let us know. I'm very curious about it.

Regards,

PawnPace
hadikhayyamian and protocol like this.
PawnPace is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2013, 14:44
Default
  #8
New Member
 
rameshkumar m bhoraniya
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 7
rameshbhoraniya is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiuan
;156885
It is interesting. Before I know your result, I also believe that the results of both case should be the same if the geomerey and boundary condition are axisymmetric. I just want to reminder you that the boundary type for the centerline of cyliner in 2D case should be axis, not symmetry. If all of your setting up is correct, I suggest running a case only with flow, then considering heat transfer.

Hope it help.
Dear Jiuan

what does it mean axis and axisymmetric?
rameshbhoraniya is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2013, 02:47
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
SSL
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 227
Rep Power: 5
msaeedsadeghi is on a distinguished road
When you model in axisymmetric mode, for example for a cylinder you just model a square that an edge would be the axis of the cylinder. Got it?
msaeedsadeghi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2013, 06:52
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Nilambar Bariha
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5
nilambar is on a distinguished road
In fluent can I simulation the dispersion problem. If yes how ? In my problem the highly compressed liquid in comes out from the pipeline.
nilambar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 16, 2015, 14:17
Default
  #11
New Member
 
azna
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 4
azna is on a distinguished road
Hi ,

Is it possible when dealing with 2d axisymmetric, to post-processing the results in a 3d view? How does it work?
azna is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2015, 07:25
Default 2D axisymmetric and 3D mismatch
  #12
New Member
 
Darshankumar Ragunath
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
darshankumar is on a distinguished road
Hi.. I am also solving a different problem but i also see that the results are varying. I'm modelling a flow around a hemispherical canopy with a vent hole to determine the drag force it experiences. I modeled the canopy geometry as a simple hemispherical shell will a vent hole in it. But the drag forces are varying by 16% when comparing the results of axisymmetric model and complete 3D model.
darshankumar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2015, 12:09
Default
  #13
New Member
 
azna
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 4
azna is on a distinguished road
Hi ,
I am simulation a cylinder. I used 2Daxisymmetric model and normal 2D which looks like a rectangular. the comparison of the results by experimental values showed that normal 2D simulation produces less relative error than 2D axisymmetric model. While all the setup is the same in both simulation. the relative error of the the former is 26% while the latter is 40%.

Thanks
azna is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3-d mesh gambit (cylinder within a cylinder) Jason ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 19 June 26, 2013 10:00
Flow over axisymmetric cone cylinder configuration Wamiq Rasheed FLUENT 1 May 14, 2007 13:48
Axisymmetric Mesh extrusion (2d-3d cylinder) ben akih CFX 0 August 21, 2006 19:03
Help meeee: Wave cylinder (sine cylinder) Ngoctq FLUENT 0 December 29, 2005 21:46
AXISYMMETRIC FLOW IN A CYLINDER Abhijit S. Joshi Main CFD Forum 1 October 28, 1999 14:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:04.