CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

How to abtain the correct y plus value.

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree5Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 3, 2009, 12:04
Default How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #1
sophie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I am currentley doung a cfd project at the university of nottingham. I am trying to get a y+ value < 1 so that the boundary layer can be properly resolved using the SA solver.

I have created several fine meshes using the boundary layer function in gambit, however I cannot seem to get a y+ value below 10. Can anyone suggest anything other than adapting the gradient in fluent as this does not seem to work.

Thanks

sophie
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2009, 15:10
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #2
Micael
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
y+ is related to mesh size, so your mesh is not enough fine if you got y+ > 10. Otherwise, reducing fluid speed might reduce y+. Be aware that y+ < 1 may require extremely fine mesh.

The boundary layer function is a good tool to use. If your surface is planar and fluid flow is parallel to it, then you can try to refine your mesh only in the normal direction to that surface.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2009, 09:50
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #3
sophie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can you tell me how to achieve small y+ values(y<3)without reducing the speed? I want to create a realistic model at real flow speeds so that i can validate my model against published NASA data.

The meshes that i have created have extremley fine boundary layers, and making them finer any finer has little effect. Is there anyway of getting the y+ values I want without reducing the speed?

Thanks,

sophie
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2009, 12:20
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #4
Micael Boulet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
First of all, did you mean Spalart-Allmaras with "SA"? I never use this model, so I cannot really help. I use k-epsilon. Anyway, I put below a consideration about mesh size and y+. That consideration is true for k-epsilon family model, but I don't know about Spalart-Allmaras.

Here is the definition of y+: (density)*(friction velocity)*(wall distance)/(viscosity)

Wall distance is the mesh size (in direction normal to boundary).

friction velocity is [(shear stress at the wall)/(density)]^0.5

It may look that if you halve the wall distance, y+ does become half of the y+ for the original mesh. This is not necessarily true because friction velocity is solution-dependent and solution is grid-dependent, especially when you are out of the valid range for y+.

Is your model 3D? Can you build a similar 2D case with extremely fine mesh to investigate it further?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2009, 13:13
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #5
sophie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes i am working with the Spalart-Allmaras solver. I am using this as it is a relatively simple one-equation model that works well for aerospace applications involving wall bounded flows. However i have run models using k-epsilon aswell but this does not make much difference on the y+ values.

I am modelling flow over an unusual shaped aircraft developed by NASA called a lifting body (M2-F2). I am currentley running preliminary models in 2d but hope to move onto 3d soon.My meshes have very thin boundary layers ranging from starting values from 1e-3 to 1e-7, so i dont think i can create even finer meshes than this.
amakson and mahdidelfan like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2009, 13:48
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #6
Micael Boulet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think I understand your difficulty. You are modeling an aircraft and the viscous layer is extremely thin because of high speed. That seem normal that you need an extremely fine mesh to resolve that layer.

Can you estimate the viscous layer thickness from litterature?

Did you try y+ > 30 (but near to 30)? There are comment about it in the FLUENT 6.3 user's guide (12.11.1 Near-Wall Mesh Guidelines).

That is the best I can do, your subject is out of my expertise. I'm mostly working with slow flow, like 1 m/s.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2009, 06:20
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #7
Ralf Schmidt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

how many rows has your boundary layer? And what is about the grow ratio b/a?

I would set the following: number of rows = 25, b/a = 1.05

Hope, that helps..

Ralf
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2009, 09:38
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #8
Friend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear

In the definition of the y plus given by Micael, it is clear that you will need to reduce the near wall distance by a factor of 1/10 in order to reduce the y plus from 10 to near 1. Otherwise if you have any limitations in constructing a smaller size then you have no more choice than to change the fluid physical properties or to choose a higher operating velocity.

Also you have the option of adapting by y plus vale of course after obtaining an initial converged solution.

Managing y plus involves an art work.... Good luck
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2009, 09:57
Default Re: How to abtain the correct y plus value.
  #9
Friend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
y plus estimation tool: http://geolab.larc.nasa.gov/APPS/YPlus/

Source: http://www.cfd-online.com/Links/tools.html#yplus

Hope it can help
Fedor and ali2 like this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2009, 09:06
Default project-airfoil
  #10
New Member
 
John Stewart
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
johnstewart00 is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I am having trouble validating a mesh for an airfoil created in gambit.

Fluid is air

I am having trouble getting the wall shear stress.Is it correct that i complete analysis in fluent and then use the value i get from fluent, in wall fluxes, as tau(wall shear stress)

The height of the first cell is 0.00038. not sure of the units
Any help would be very much appreciated because I am at a stand still with my project at the moment

Thanks,
John

Last edited by johnstewart00; April 2, 2009 at 13:53. Reason: update
johnstewart00 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 2, 2009, 19:36
Default
  #11
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 8
panda is on a distinguished road
If you have completed the analysis, you may find the y plus distribution anywhere around the wall directly from the Fluent postprocessing
panda is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 29, 2010, 01:20
Default Dear
  #12
New Member
 
hassan
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
hassan79 is on a distinguished road
I want simulate heat transfer in turbulent air flow with sudden expansion pipe with constant heat flux, i need to calculate surface Nusselt number for down stream......
I want to ask you i get y+37 I tried to change first row no thing happen how can calculate first row and growth factor and no of row to get y+ near 1 ...........

Here is the definition of y+: (density)*(friction velocity)*(wall distance)/ (viscosity)

How can I know wall distance from equation above?

Wall distance is the mesh size (in direction normal to boundary).

Friction velocity is [(shear stress at the wall)/ (density)] ^0.5

How can I know shear stress at the wall for turbulent air flow from equation above?

My model 3D? Re 5000-90000 and d=0.0254 and D= 0.09525
hassan79 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2010, 01:20
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 7
George Chen 28 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by hassan79 View Post
I want simulate heat transfer in turbulent air flow with sudden expansion pipe with constant heat flux, i need to calculate surface Nusselt number for down stream......
I want to ask you i get y+37 I tried to change first row no thing happen how can calculate first row and growth factor and no of row to get y+ near 1 ...........

Here is the definition of y+: (density)*(friction velocity)*(wall distance)/ (viscosity)

How can I know wall distance from equation above?

Wall distance is the mesh size (in direction normal to boundary).

Friction velocity is [(shear stress at the wall)/ (density)] ^0.5

How can I know shear stress at the wall for turbulent air flow from equation above?

My model 3D? Re 5000-90000 and d=0.0254 and D= 0.09525
you can decide "wall distance"; "density" and "viscosity" are fluid property. someone had said "shear stress at the wall" was solution-depended and solution is grid-depended. it means that at first you should obtain a convergenced solution and then you can calculate y+ value, finally grid-adaption by y+ value.
George Chen 28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2010, 00:04
Default HI
  #14
New Member
 
hassan
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
hassan79 is on a distinguished road
aske about any relation ship between first row and groth factor and now ofv row and depth

my case it is expansion pipe i fond formala from gird spacing calculator to find first row ? iam not sure about this formal it is correct or no ?


could u help me
Re 8112
d= 0.0254

D = 0.09525
fluid = air
temprature inlet = 20
constant heat flux = 720
i want to calculate surface nusel no



thank u
Hassanhayawi@hotmail.com
hassan79 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2010, 06:14
Default
  #15
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 7
George Chen 28 is on a distinguished road
why not write complete sentences?
George Chen 28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2010, 16:20
Question
  #16
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 7
FabioT is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friend
;157166
I found this same tool on the web but I don't understand what the Ref. Length is.

Does anybody know it?

Thanks,

Fabio
FabioT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2010, 16:03
Thumbs up
  #17
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 7
FabioT is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FabioT View Post
I found this same tool on the web but I don't understand what the Ref. Length is.

Does anybody know it?

Thanks,

Fabio
Check here y+ Value & Aspect Ratio {Wind Tunnel Model} .

the ref. length is the average length of the edge of the considered object.
FabioT is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2010, 23:23
Default
  #18
srr
New Member
 
srr
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
srr is on a distinguished road
Try to have a y+>30 it is also ok for Spalart-Allmaras.

y+=1 or y+>30 in Spalart-Allmaras model
srr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 11, 2011, 00:33
Exclamation similar problem..
  #19
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8
sgrshukla is on a distinguished road
Hi, i have a linear jet throwing air at high speed at some angle with wall, using enhanced wall treatment, Realizable, k-epsilon model, i have pretty fine mesh but still facing problem with wall yplus >5 near jet region.
the flow is 15C and operating temp is 25C.

I would appreciate your help.
sgrshukla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2011, 20:59
Default Strange Problem
  #20
New Member
 
Hooman
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
hooman.4028 is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I am modelling flow over an ellipse using k=e model. I have a problem with my yplus magnitude.....my yplus magnitude near my wall is around 500 and it decreases by going far from the wall and reaches to zero in the first node. first i don't know why it doesn't start from zero and then goes to higher magnitudes? second, why i have such a high magnitude of yplus?my speed is 40 m/s and my meshes are really fined. also i defined boundary layer meshes in gambit.

Thanks,
hooman.4028 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can any one correct this(udf) solomon FLUENT 5 December 5, 2007 02:24
Is this correct? Siva FLUENT 3 August 14, 2007 08:35
to correct me an udf program farida hamadi FLUENT 0 December 18, 2004 06:54
Is this UDF correct? JJ FLUENT 3 April 8, 2001 18:54
Result is not correct Li FLUENT 1 December 30, 2000 01:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:13.