CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Buoyant turbulent flows

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 12, 2009, 06:48
Default Buoyant turbulent flows
  #1
Sudhir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
for buoyant turbulent flows which model is better ? k-omega, RSM are not converging even after 30000 iteration minimum face area (m2): 1.000000e-004 maximum face area (m2): 2.500730e-004 is this fine ??
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 12, 2009, 08:44
Default Re: Buoyant turbulent flows
  #2
Sudhir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
one more question as i am using boundary layer mesh cell size will depend on 1st cell and b/a ratio, so what can be possible size of first cell taking decision based on no of cells and change in Nu no. may not be correct because of no of bl steps (am using ratio 1.2)

is there any way by which i can say grid is fine based on results of simulations ? i am getting max Y+ value 0.14 (RSM MODEL)

thanks in advance
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2009, 22:21
Default
  #3
Member
 
Micael Boulet
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 9
Micael is on a distinguished road
Hi Sudhir,

I am just experienced with k-epsilon yet.

Here are some strategies I successfully used to converge turbulent flow in mixed convection.

- first, converge without gravity
- use "coupled" for pressure-velocity coupling
- use "PRESTO" for pressure discretization (second order upwind for others)
- reduce under-relaxation factor, slowly and by increment between some hundred iterations, especially turbulence properties (like k and epsilon)
- reduce momentum explicit relaxation factors of the coupled algoritm

Before reducing any relaxation factor, wait for stagnation during iterations. Reducing those factors also reduce convergence rate, so it is better to apply it only when there are stagnation or instability in residuals.

Mesh quality is very important. y+ = 0.14 is very fine. However, free convection is challenging the solver everywhere in the domain, not just at wall.

I hope this will help you.

Micael
Micael is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2009, 07:52
Default
  #4
Member
 
Micael Boulet
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 9
Micael is on a distinguished road
I just think that if your problem is purely free convection, then is it not usefull to solve without gravity, since that will produce no flow at all. In that case, you can start with a low gravity value (like 0.98 instead of 9.8).
Micael is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modeling Turbulent Horizontal Buoyant Jets Jack Travis Main CFD Forum 2 September 11, 2006 06:36
turbulent buoyant plume Theo FLUENT 0 February 13, 2006 10:07
About low Re number turbulent flows gorka Main CFD Forum 13 April 2, 2003 05:19
LES for buoyant flows? George Bergantz Phoenics 0 December 18, 2000 12:41
CFD of turbulent flows raj calay Main CFD Forum 23 April 23, 1999 05:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:24.