|June 25, 2009, 15:13||
Fluent Runtime After Adaption
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 13Rep Power: 7
Wondering what others experience is with running Fluent and hanging-node adaption.
I have a case with 50 million finite volumes that takes X sec/iteration.
I adapted and have 65 million finite volumes and it now takes 4X sec/iteration.
I would expect less, but any other experiences would be useful.
|June 25, 2009, 15:32||
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 25Rep Power: 7
i presume you are running a distributed parallel run? (or you have very nice SMP hardware...)
what i have seen is that the adapted mesh sometimes tend to stay on the partition where it was generated. You will start seeing unequal loads on the parallel cores - in effect you might have a few of your cores which now has 4 times as many cells to compute. you can either manually repartition in Fluent, or try activating the load balancing for parallel runs.
just a thought...
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Stopping a Fluent batch job AND saving the data! Possible?||Volker Pawlik||FLUENT||7||May 22, 2014 22:30|
|Two questions on Fluent UDF||Steven||Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming||4||September 20, 2013 16:30|
|FLUENT to ANSYS Temperature Mapping Procedure||schreiberc1||FLUENT||0||June 29, 2006 13:50|
|Integration of a Custom C++ Model into FLUENT||Syed Haider||FLUENT||1||February 20, 2006 05:49|
|Run Fluent in batch mode||Shengping LUO||FLUENT||2||October 24, 2000 05:42|